Raising the Bar: A Qualitative Study of a Co-Produced Model for Promoting research Partnerships in Mental Health

被引:3
|
作者
River, Jo [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Bellingham, Brett [1 ]
Isobel, Sophie [3 ]
Gill, Katherine [1 ]
Boydell, Katherine [4 ]
Conlon, Liam [3 ]
Goodhew, Mark [5 ]
Cutler, Natalie [1 ]
Kemp, Holly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ultimo, Australia
[2] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
[4] Black Dog Inst, Randwick, Australia
[5] Univ Notre Dame, Fremantle, Australia
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Northern Sydney Local Hlth, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
community based research; critical theory; emancipatory research; methods in qualitative inquiry; qualitative evaluation; mental health; PEER SUPPORT; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; CRITERIA; PATIENT; SERVICE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1177/16094069231213268
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Internationally, lead agencies and consumer movements emphasise the need for high-level research participation in mental health. However, evidence suggests that people with lived experience tend to be recruited as subjects rather than as active agents in research, or are consulted in tokenistic ways. Although participatory research has the potential to rectify epistemic disparities, few studies have grappled with how to move from exclusion and tokenism to high-level research participation. This paper describes a qualitative co-evaluation of a co-produced model of research partnership, Raising the Bar, which involved deliberate establishment and facilitation of six participatory research teams, comprising 28 lived experience and 'conventional' mental health researchers. Findings indicate that the theoretical elements of the model set the bar high from the outset, supporting research teams to address inconsistencies in knowledge about participation. It also provided researchers with the competencies and resources to undertake participatory research in egalitarian team structures, and to negotiate new forms of non-traditional research outputs - thereby challenging whom research might be for and how it might be made accessible. Finally, the model shifted collective meanings about research, lending credibility to participatory practices, which came to be seen as essential for meeting the needs of affected communities. Nonetheless, systemic barriers to participatory research remain, and need to be recognised and acted upon to promote a culture that supports high-level research participation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMMUNE - Promoting recovery focused practice through co-produced mental health nursing education
    Happell, Brenda
    Bocking, Julia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2017, 26 : 21 - 21
  • [2] Comparison of a co-produced mental health service to traditional services: A co-produced mixed-methods cross-sectional study
    Pocobello, Raffaella
    el Sehity, Tarek
    Negrogno, Luca
    Minervini, Carlo
    Guida, Maddalena
    Venerito, Cosimo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2020, 29 (03) : 460 - 475
  • [3] Exploring perspectives of stigma and discrimination among people with lived experience of mental health conditions: a co-produced qualitative study
    Gronholm, Petra C.
    Kline, Sarah
    Lamba, Muskan
    Lempp, Heidi
    Mahkmud, Akerke
    Cano, Guadalupe Morales
    Vashisht, Kriti
    Juan, Norha Vera San
    Sunkel, Charlene
    [J]. ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 70
  • [4] Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co-produced qualitative study with young people who have experience of mental health difficulties
    Dewa, Lindsay H.
    Lawrence-Jones, Anna
    Crandell, Caroline
    Jaques, Jack
    Pickles, Katy
    Lavelle, Mary
    Pappa, Sofia
    Aylin, Paul
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 : 134 - 146
  • [5] Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study
    Trevillion, Kylee
    Stuart, Ruth
    Ocloo, Josephine
    Broeckelmann, Eva
    Jeffreys, Stephen
    Jeynes, Tamar
    Allen, Dawn
    Russell, Jessica
    Billings, Jo
    Crawford, Mike J.
    Dale, Oliver
    Haigh, Rex
    Moran, Paul
    McNicholas, Shirley
    Nicholls, Vicky
    Foye, Una
    Simpson, Alan
    Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
    Johnson, Sonia
    Oram, Sian
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study
    Kylee Trevillion
    Ruth Stuart
    Josephine Ocloo
    Eva Broeckelmann
    Stephen Jeffreys
    Tamar Jeynes
    Dawn Allen
    Jessica Russell
    Jo Billings
    Mike J. Crawford
    Oliver Dale
    Rex Haigh
    Paul Moran
    Shirley McNicholas
    Vicky Nicholls
    Una Foye
    Alan Simpson
    Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
    Sonia Johnson
    Sian Oram
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [7] Social, cultural and community engagement and mental health: cross-disciplinary, co-produced research agenda
    Fancourt, Daisy
    Bhui, Kamaldeep
    Chatterjee, Helen
    Crawford, Paul
    Crossick, Geoffrey
    DeNora, Tia
    South, Jane
    [J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [8] "It's really important work…and celebrating that, I think, is really important" - co-produced qualitative research into future of mental health nurse education
    Pearson, Mark
    Long, Louisa
    Baker, Charley
    Doran, Dan
    Pringle, Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024,
  • [9] Recovery college dropout: A qualitative study of external, relational and course-related dropout drivers in co-produced mental health care
    Andersen, Ditte
    Waldemar, Anna Kristine
    Kirkegaard, Sine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 (05) : 1346 - 1354
  • [10] Cure therapeutics and strategic prevention: raising the bar for mental health research
    T R Insel
    E M Scolnick
    [J]. Molecular Psychiatry, 2006, 11 : 11 - 17