Do strong oligopolies reverse Green Paradox effects?

被引:2
|
作者
van der Meijden, Gerard [1 ,2 ]
Benchekroun, Hassan [3 ,4 ]
van der Ploeg, Frederick [5 ,6 ]
Withagen, Cees [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tinbergen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] CIREQ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
加拿大魁北克医学研究基金会;
关键词
Reversal Green Paradox effects; Oligopoly; Limit pricing; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102434
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a competitive market renewable energy subsidies or postponement of carbon pricing tend to boost emissions and global warming in the short run. This so-called Green Paradox effect may be reversed if fossil-fuel firms operate under an oligopoly and the number of members is low enough. A reversal of the Green Paradox always occurs under a fossil fuel monopoly. If the extraction costs of fossil fuel depend on the aggregate remaining stock of reserves, Green Paradox effects vanish if the number of oligopolists becomes infinitely large. For an intermediate number of members, a Green Paradox occurs. The strength of the Green Paradox effect depends non-monotonically on the number of oligopolists. We also show that a Green Paradox is more likely for higher slopes of the demand curve, higher sensitivities of unit extraction costs with respect to remaining reserves, and lower interest rates.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do other firms matter in oligopolies?
    Haskel, J
    Scaramozzino, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 45 (01): : 27 - 45
  • [2] Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Alerts That Reverse With Intervention: Treatment Paradox and What to Do About It
    Skinner, Stanley A.
    Holdefer, Robert N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 31 (02) : 118 - 126
  • [3] ENTRY BARRIERS AND MULTIPRODUCT OLIGOPOLIES - DO THEY FOREBEAR OR SPOIL
    GELFAND, MD
    SPILLER, PT
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1987, 5 (01) : 101 - 113
  • [4] SIMPSONS PARADOX IN REVERSE
    MANTEL, N
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1982, 36 (04): : 395 - 395
  • [5] The reverse Allais paradox
    Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 119 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [6] Counterintuitive number effects in experimental oligopolies
    Orzen, Henrik
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 11 (04) : 390 - 401
  • [7] The strong referendum paradox
    Dindar, Hayrullah
    Laffond, Gilbert
    Laine, Jean
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2017, 51 (04) : 1707 - 1731
  • [8] Counterintuitive number effects in experimental oligopolies
    Henrik Orzen
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2008, 11 : 390 - 401
  • [9] The strong referendum paradox
    Hayrullah Dindar
    Gilbert Laffond
    Jean Laine
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2017, 51 : 1707 - 1731
  • [10] Divestment prevails over the green paradox when anticipating strong future climate policies
    Nico Bauer
    Christophe McGlade
    Jérôme Hilaire
    Paul Ekins
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 130 - 134