Residents as supervisors: How senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions

被引:1
|
作者
Nelson, Kayla [1 ]
McQuillan, Sarah [1 ]
Gingerich, Andrea [2 ]
Regehr, Glenn [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Obstet & Gynecol, Pediat & Adolescent Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Northern British Columbia, Northern Med Program, Prince George, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
ATTENDING PHYSICIANS; DEVELOP TRUST; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1111/medu.15017
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundAs residency programmes transition to competency-based medical education, there has been substantial inquiry into understanding how ad hoc entrustment decisions are made by attending supervisors in the clinical context. However, although attendings are ultimately responsible for the decisions and actions of resident trainees, senior residents are often the ones directly supervising junior residents enrolled in competency-based training programmes. This clinical dynamic has been largely overlooked in the ad hoc entrustment literature. The purpose of this study was to explore the considerations senior residents entertain when making ad hoc entrustment decisions for their junior resident colleagues. MethodsIn semi-structured interviews, 11 senior resident supervisors (third, fourth and fifth year) in obstetrics and gynaecology described how they entrust junior residents with clinical activities in the moment. Following constructivist grounded theory methodology, data were iteratively collected and coded with constant comparison until theoretical sufficiency was determined. ResultsSenior residents described many similar considerations as attendings regarding ad hoc entrustment of junior residents, including patient safety, desire to optimise the learning environment, junior resident qualities (such as discernment and communication skills), learner handover from colleagues, and situational factors. Uniquely, senior residents discussed how their role as a middle manager and their desire to protect the junior resident (from burnout, becoming a second victim and from attendings) impacts their decisions. ConclusionsAlthough senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions with some similar considerations to attendings, they also seem to think about additional factors. It may be that these different considerations need to be accommodated in documentation of ad hoc entrustment decisions if these documents are to be used for high-stakes summative entrustment decisions made by competency committees.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 731
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The Dance Between Attending Physicians and Senior Residents as Teachers and Supervisors
    Balmer, Dorene F.
    Giardino, Angelo P.
    Richards, Boyd F.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2012, 129 (05) : 910 - 915
  • [2] How residents think and make medical decisions: Implications for education and patient safety
    Young, Jeffrey S.
    Smith, Robert L.
    Guerlain, Stephanie
    Nolley, Barbara
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2007, 73 (06) : 548 - 553
  • [3] How Dermatology Residents' Clinical Supervisors See Themselves
    Diaz-Diaz, R. M.
    Medina-Montalvo, S.
    Calzada, Y. G.
    Jaen-Olasolo, P.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2022, 113 (08): : T838 - T839
  • [4] How to Make Ad Hoc Proof Automation Less Ad Hoc
    Gonthier, Georges
    Ziliani, Beta
    Nanevski, Aleksandar
    Dreyer, Derek
    [J]. ICFP 11 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 ACM SIGPLAN: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING, 2011, : 163 - 175
  • [5] How to Make Ad Hoc Proof Automation Less Ad Hoc
    Gonthier, Georges
    Ziliani, Beta
    Nanevski, Aleksandar
    Dreyer, Derek
    [J]. ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2011, 46 (09) : 163 - 175
  • [6] PICU FELLOW ENTRUSTMENT: HOW DO FACULTY MAKE SUPERVISION DECISIONS?
    Poeppelman, Rachel
    Stewart, Claire
    Siems, Ashley
    Mitchell, Diana
    Jani, Priti
    Moore-Clingenpeel, Melissa
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48
  • [7] How to make ad hoc proof automation less ad hoc
    Gonthier, Georges
    Ziliani, Beta
    Nanevski, Aleksandar
    Dreyer, Derek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING, 2013, 23 (04) : 357 - 401
  • [8] HOW TO MAKE AD-HOC POLYMORPHISM LESS AD HOC
    WADLER, P
    BLOTT, S
    [J]. CONFERENCE RECORD OF THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES, 1989, : 60 - 76
  • [9] How residents think and make medical decisions: Implications for education and patient safety - Discussion
    Potts, John R., II
    Ivatury, Rao
    Young, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2007, 73 (06) : 553 - 554
  • [10] "Languaging" tacit judgment in formal postgraduate assessment: the documentation of ad hoc and summative entrustment decisions
    van Enk, Anneke
    ten Cate, Olle
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 9 (06) : 373 - 378