Policy-induced cooperative knowledge network, university-industry collaboration and firm innovation: Evidence from the Greater Bay Area

被引:3
|
作者
Yang, Zhao [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yongquan [2 ]
Ma, Jian [2 ]
Lu, Angela [2 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Informat Syst Dept, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
UI collaboration; High-tech policy; Regional innovation; Collaborative innovation networks; Social network analysis; Knowledge network; MODERATING ROLE; DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY; TECHNOLOGY CLUSTERS; PERFORMANCE; EMBEDDEDNESS; CENTRALITY; DISCOVERY; CHINA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The major goal of this paper is to analyze the interactive impact of China's high-tech policies on universityindustry (UI) collaboration and firm innovation by a network-based approach. Introducing high-tech policy to traditional innovative networks, we constructed a policy-induced UI collaboration network and applied social network analysis (SNA) method to empirically study the role of high-tech policies and the underlying mechanisms in firm innovation in the Greater Bay Area (GBA). This policy-induced innovative network consists of over 2000 innovative entities in GBA from 2012 to 2021, which reflects dynamic characteristics of innovative activities in this region. Based on this network, we find that high-tech policies play a positive and key role in regional innovation and we also clarify some potential mechanisms and routes in the effect of policies on UI collaboration and firm innovation. This paper advances our understanding of innovative networks and policyinduced regional innovation, which has implications for innovation policymaking in world-class innovative centers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] University-industry collaboration and firm innovation: an empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry
    Tian, Mingyu
    Su, Yiwei
    Yang, Zhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2022, 47 (05): : 1488 - 1505
  • [2] Firm innovation strategy and university-industry collaboration: The Turkish case
    Beyhan, Berna
    Findik, Derya
    [J]. IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2014, 29 (342): : 71 - 101
  • [3] Network DEA approach for measuring the efficiency of University-Industry Collaboration Innovation: Evidence from China
    Yu, Yu
    Shi, Qinfen
    Wu, Jie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2015 ISTANBUL: 15TH INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS CONFERENCE, 2015, : 600 - 601
  • [4] A Knowledge Management Approach for The University-Industry Collaboration in Open Innovation
    Draghici, Anca
    Baban, Calin-Florin
    Gogan, Maria-Luminita
    Ivascu, Larisa-Victoria
    [J]. 2ND GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND TOURISM, 2015, 23 : 23 - 32
  • [5] Does university-industry collaboration improve firm productivity? Evidence from China
    Li, Yuanqi
    Li, Zhuo
    Liu, Ting
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [6] The effect of university-industry collaboration policy on universities' knowledge innovation and achievements transformation: based on innovation chain
    Cheng, Hua
    Zhang, Zhiying
    Huang, Qing
    Liao, Zhongju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2020, 45 (02): : 522 - 543
  • [7] University-industry innovation community dynamics and knowledge transfer: Evidence from China
    Wang, Wenjing
    Lu, Shan
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2021, 106
  • [8] Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms
    Shi, Xing
    Wu, Yanrui
    Fu, Dahai
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 86 : 39 - 53
  • [9] Barriers to university-industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey
    Kleiner-Schaefer, Timo
    Schaefer, Kerstin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2022, 47 (03): : 872 - 905
  • [10] Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach
    Ponds, Roderik
    van Oort, Frank
    Frenken, Koen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 10 (02) : 231 - 255