Laryngeal office-based procedures: A safe approach

被引:1
|
作者
Bar, R. [1 ,2 ]
Mattei, A. [1 ,3 ]
Haddad, R. [1 ]
Giovanni, A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, La Conception Univ Hosp, ENT HNS Dept, Marseille, France
[2] Galilee Med Ctr, ENT HNS Dept, Nahariyya, Israel
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix En Provence, France
关键词
In-office procedures; Benign vocal fold lesions; Laser; Biopsy; Medialization;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104128
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Laryngeal surgeries using a flexible nasopharyngoscope equipped with an operative channel has gained popularity, with gradual increase in the variety of interventional office-based procedures, under local anesthesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze the tolerance of such procedures. Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study. 337 cases were performed during 2 years. We collected the following data: type of pathology, type of procedure and modalities of anesthesia, adverse events. Results: 19 % of the visits were for the purpose of Biopsy, 65 % for an injection, and Trublue Laser was utilized in 12 % of the procedures. Regarding the pathologies, 27 % were vocal fold paralysis, 18 % leukoplakia or another suspicious lesion, 15 % recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, 13 % neuromuscular disorder, 9 % vocal fold scarring, 7 % vocal cord atrophy and 6 % had an inflammatory presentation. Side effects were documented in 26 visits (7.7 %) and were minor in almost all the encounters: they included strong reflexive cough, deep throat pain, discomfort, gag reflex, anxiety, vagal discomfort, malaise, hypersalivation, nose pain, labile hypertension. More severe side effects were very rare and included septal wound and epistaxis, erythematous rash, dyspnea, and transient dysarthria. 13 procedures were either aborted, or canceled at initial steps, due to inability of the patient to tolerate the procedure and were rescheduled for general anesthesia. 97 % of the cases were released home after 1 h of surveillance. Conclusion: Office-based flexible interventional laryngoscopy under local anesthesia is a safe and well-tolerated procedure, with abundance of various interventions feasible on ambulatory, office-based setup.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Office-based laryngeal procedures: An integrated approach
    Sheikhany A.
    [J]. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2014, 30 (2) : 67 - 68
  • [2] Office-Based Laryngeal Procedures
    Shah, Manish D.
    Johns, Michael M., III
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 46 (01) : 75 - +
  • [3] Office-based laryngeal procedures
    Woo, P
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 39 (01) : 111 - +
  • [4] Office-Based Procedures for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Laryngeal Pathology
    Wellenstein, David J.
    Schutte, Henrieke W.
    Takes, Robert P.
    Honings, Jimmie
    Marres, Henri A. M.
    Burns, James A.
    van den Broek, Guido B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2018, 32 (04) : 502 - 513
  • [5] Office-based endovascular suite is safe for most procedures
    Jain, Krishna
    Munn, John
    Rummel, Mark C.
    Johnston, Dan
    Longton, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (01) : 186 - 191
  • [6] Office-Based Endovascular Suite Is Safe for Most Procedures
    Jain, Krishna M.
    Munn, John
    Rummel, Mark
    Johnston, Dan
    Longton, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 292 - 292
  • [7] Office-Based Laryngeal Injections
    Mallur, Pavan S.
    Rosen, Clark A.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 46 (01) : 85 - +
  • [8] Tolerance of Patients Using Different Approaches in Laryngeal Office-Based Procedures
    Hamdan, Abdul-Latif
    Jabbour, Christopher
    Khalifee, Elie
    Ghanem, Anthony
    El Hage, Aya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2023, 37 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [9] Office-based prostate procedures
    Atug, F
    Castle, EP
    Thomas, R
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 32 (03) : 327 - +
  • [10] Office-based procedures in rhinosinusitis
    Armstrong, M
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 38 (06) : 1327 - +