Obesity, Twin Pregnancy, and the Role of Assisted Reproductive Technology

被引:1
|
作者
Bone, Jeffrey N. [1 ,2 ]
Joseph, K. S. [1 ,3 ]
Magee, Laura A. [4 ]
Wang, Li Qing [1 ]
John, Sid [1 ]
Bedaiwy, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Mayer, Chantal [1 ]
Lisonkova, Sarka [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Childrens & Womens Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 950 W 28th Ave,Room CSB V3-340, Vancouver, BC V6A 3V4, Canada
[2] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Biostat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Sch Life Course Sci, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth, London, England
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; MATERNAL OBESITY; UNITED-STATES; MEDIATION; WEIGHT; RISK; VALIDITY; HEIGHT; ACCESS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50934
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance The prevalence of overweight and obesity (body mass index [BMI] >= 25) has increased globally, and high BMI has been linked to higher rates of twin birth. However, evidence from large population-based studies is lacking; the issue needs careful study, as women with obesity are also more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), which frequently results in twin pregnancy.Objective To examine the association between BMI and twin birth and the role of ART as a potential mediator in this association.Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included all live births and stillbirths with gestational age of 20 weeks or longer in British Columbia, Canada, from 2008 to 2020, using data from the British Columbia Perinatal Database Registry. Data analysis was conducted from November 2022 to June 2023.Exposures Prepregnancy BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, and use of ART.Main Outcomes and Measures The study assessed whether prepregnancy BMI is associated with the rate of twin vs singleton delivery and whether this association is explained by the differential use of ART in women with obesity.Results A total of 524 845 deliveries at 20 weeks' or longer gestation occurred in British Columbia during the study period, and 392 046 women had complete data on prepregnancy BMI. The median (IQR) age was 31.4 (27.7-35.0) years, approximately half were nulliparous (243 443 [46.4%]) and less than 10% smoked during pregnancy (36 894 [7.1%]). Overall, 8295 women had a twin delivery (15.8 per 1000 deliveries), and rates per 1000 deliveries by prepregnancy BMI categories were 11.9 (underweight), 15.1 (normal), 16.0 (overweight), 16.0 (obesity class I), 16.7 (obesity class II), and 18.9 (obesity class III). After adjustment for other covariates, women with underweight had relatively 16% fewer twins compared with women with normal BMI (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95), while women with overweight, class I obesity, class II obesity, and class III obesity had 14% (aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21), 16% (aRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.27), 17% (aRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34), and 41% higher rates (aRR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.66), respectively. The proportion of women who conceived by ART increased with increasing BMI, and ART was associated with nearly a 12-fold higher rate of twin delivery (aRR, 11.80; 95% CI 11.10-12.54). ART explained about a quarter of the association between obesity class I and II and twin delivery (eg, obesity class I, 23% mediated; 95% CI, 7%-39% mediated), but none of this association was mediated by ART in women with class III obesity.Conclusions and relevance In this cohort study of 524 845 births, the rate of twin birth increased with increasing prepregnancy BMI. In women with a BMI between 30 and 40, approximately one-quarter of this association was explained by higher use of ART; however, there was no evidence of such mediation in women with BMI of 40 or greater.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fetal cardiac remodeling in twin pregnancy conceived by assisted reproductive technology
    Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.
    Cruz-Lemini, M.
    Rodriguez-Lopez, M.
    Gonce, A.
    Garcia-Otero, L.
    Ayuso, H.
    Sitges, M.
    Bijnens, B.
    Balasch, J.
    Gratacos, E.
    Crispi, F.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [2] Associations of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy With Risk of Congenital Heart Defects
    Wen, Shi Wu
    Miao, Qun
    Taljaard, Monica
    Lougheed, Jane
    Gaudet, Laura
    Davies, Michael
    Lanes, Andrea
    Leader, Art
    Corsi, Daniel J.
    Sprague, Ann E.
    Walker, Mark
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2020, 174 (05) : 446 - 454
  • [3] Re: Fetal cardiac remodeling in twin pregnancy conceived by assisted reproductive technology
    Moon-Grady, A. J.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (01) : 21 - 21
  • [4] The role of assisted reproductive technology in the management of recurrent pregnancy loss
    Go, Kathryn J.
    Patel, Jay C.
    Cunningham, Donna L.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2009, 16 (06) : 459 - 463
  • [5] Obesity and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
    Bellver, Jose
    Busso, Cristiano
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Remohí, José
    Simón, Carlos
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 12 (05) : 562 - 568
  • [6] Update on obesity and assisted reproductive technology
    Elnashar, Aboubakr Mohamed
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [7] Update on obesity and assisted reproductive technology
    Aboubakr Mohamed Elnashar
    [J]. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 28
  • [8] Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome
    Johnston-MacAnanny, Erika B.
    Baxter, Jason K.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04): : 953 - 953
  • [9] Tuberculosis in pregnancy and assisted reproductive technology
    Cao, Wenli
    Fu, Xiayan
    Li, Haiyang
    Bei, Jialu
    Li, Lisha
    Wang, Ling
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 18 (02): : 80 - 88
  • [10] Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcomes
    Helmerhorst, F. M.
    Keirse, M. J. N. C.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1329 - 1329