Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit

被引:0
|
作者
Gadea-Company, Patricia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Angulo, Carmen Casal [1 ,4 ]
Navarro, Clara Hurtado [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Nursing & Podiatry, Valencia, Spain
[2] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Dept Lithotripsy, Valencia, Spain
[3] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Endourol Unit, Valencia, Spain
[4] Dept Sanitary Emergencies Comun Valenciana SES CV, Valencia, Spain
[5] Univ Hosp Doctor Peset, Dept Teaching, Valencia, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0286565
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
IntroductionA lack of professional communication and collaboration may be one of the main causes of medication errors. The objective was to evaluate the results of the implementation of ISBAR as a communication and safety tool in a Lithotripsy and Endourologic Unit of a tertiary public hospital. MethodsA total of 457 patients were included in a retrospective study from 2014 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (357 patients) in which an endourological procedure was performed before march of 2018 (without the implementation of ISBAR tool) and Group B (100 patients) with the implementation of ISBAR tool. The inclusion criteria were patients accepted for surgical intervention by anaesthesiology Department and operated in the period of the study. The variables analysed included number of procedures, global, intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, urinary infection or sepsis, NPR (FMEA), percentage of suspended surgical patients and hospital stay. ResultsThe postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups, but a trend to diminishing was seen in the complication in the group B. The sepsis reduced its incidence and it was close to significant difference. The operative time was shorter in group B 119,11min (114,63-123,59) vs 115,11min (109,63-121,67) p = 0,3. The reduction in the main postoperative complication (sepsis) explained the lower hospital stay for group B. The severe adverse events detected were reduced completely. ConclusionsISBAR tool was an effective patient safety tool improving quality care. To provide safe patient care and improving quality is indispensable an effective communication flow.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Usability Evaluation of the Preoperative ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Desktop Virtual Reality Application: Qualitative Observational Study
    Andreasen, Eva Mari
    Hoigaard, Rune
    Berg, Helen
    Steinsbekk, Aslak
    Haraldstad, Kristin
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (04):
  • [2] The impact of situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) on safety attitudes in the obstetrics department
    Ting, Wan-Hua
    Peng, Fu-Shiang
    Lin, Ho-Hsiung
    Hsiao, Sheng-Mou
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 56 (02): : 171 - 174
  • [3] The effect of situation, background, assessment, recommendation-based safety program on patient safety culture in intensive care unit nurses
    Etemadifar, Shahram
    Sedighi, Zeynab
    Sedehi, Morteza
    Masoudi, Reza
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [4] Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study
    Scolari, Emil
    Soncini, Leda
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    Schneider, Antoine Guillaume
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 27 (06) : 796 - 803