Procedure-specific simulation for vaginal surgery training: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Geoffrion, Roxana [1 ,5 ]
Koenig, Nicole A. [1 ]
Cundiff, Geoffrey W. [1 ]
Flood, Catherine [2 ]
Hyakutake, Momoe T. [2 ]
Schulz, Jane [2 ]
Brennand, Erin A. [3 ]
Lee, Terry [4 ]
Singer, Joel [4 ]
Todd, Nicole J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Specialties, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Urogynecol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Div Urogynecol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Ctr Adv Hlth Outcomes, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Specialties, Suite 930,1125 Howe St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K8, Canada
关键词
gynecologic surgery; low fidelity simulation; surgical education; vaginal hysterectomy; SURGICAL SKILLS; GYNECOLOGY RESIDENTS; OBSTETRICS; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14810
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Vaginal surgery has a superior outcome profile compared with other surgical routes, yet skills are declining because of low case volumes. Graduating residents' confidence and preparedness for vaginal surgery has plummeted in the past decade. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether procedure-specific simulation skills, versus usual training, result in improved operative competence. Material and methods: We completed a randomized controlled trial of didactic and procedural training via low fidelity vaginal surgery models for anterior repair, posterior repair (PR), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), recruiting novice gynecology residents at three academic centers. We evaluated performance via global rating scale (GRS) in the real operating room and for corresponding procedures by attending surgeon blinded to group. Prespecified secondary outcomes included procedural steps knowledge, overall performance, satisfaction, self-confidence and intraoperative parameters. A priori sample size estimated 50 residents (20% absolute difference in GRS score, 25% SD, 80% power, alpha 0.05). : Registration no. NCT05887570. Results: We randomized 83 residents to intervention or control and 55 completed the trial (2011-23). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for more fourth-year control residents. After adjustment of confounders (age, level, baseline knowledge), GRS scores showed significant differences overall (mean difference 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-16.1; p = 0.044) and for VH (mean difference 12.0; 95% CI: 1.8-22.3; p = 0.02). The intervention group had significantly higher procedural steps knowledge and self-confidence for VH and/or PR (p < 0.05, adjusted analysis). Estimated blood loss, operative time and complications were similar between groups. Conclusions: Compared to usual training, procedure-specific didactic and low fidelity simulation modules for vaginal surgery resulted in significant improvements in operative performance and several other skill parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1174
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure-specific consent form
    Crozier, Jack
    Williams, Ann
    Chan, Steven T. F.
    Thompson, Graeme
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (1-2) : E55 - E59
  • [2] Evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery simulation training: A randomized controlled trial
    Valdis, Matthew
    Chu, Michael W. A.
    Schlachta, Christopher
    Kiaii, Bob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 151 (06): : 1498 - +
  • [3] Rainer Richter: "A procedure-specific training is also still useful"
    Richter, R
    [J]. VERHALTENSTHERAPIE, 2005, 15 (04) : 262 - 263
  • [4] Procedure-specific Training for Robot-assisted Distal Pancreatectomy
    Klompmaker, Sjors
    van der Vliet, Walderik J.
    Thoolen, Stijn J.
    Ore, Ana Sofia
    Verkoulen, Koen
    Solis-Velasco, Monica
    Canacari, Elena G.
    Kruskal, Jonathan B.
    Khwaja, Khalid O.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Callery, Mark P.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Moser, A. James
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (01) : E18 - E27
  • [5] PROSPECT Guideline for Haemorrhoid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Procedure-specific
    Bikfalvi, A.
    Faes, C.
    Freys, S. M.
    Joshi, G. P.
    Van de Velde, M.
    Albrecht, E.
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 8S - 8S
  • [6] Classroom and simulation team training: a randomized controlled trial
    Clay-Williams, Robyn
    Mcintosh, Catherine A.
    Kerridge, Ross
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 25 (03) : 314 - 321
  • [7] Simulation Training in an Obstetric Clerkship A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Holmstroem, Shelly W.
    Downes, Katheryne
    Mayer, James C.
    Learman, Lee A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03): : 649 - 654
  • [8] Development and validation of a procedure-specific assessment tool for hands-on surgical training in congenital heart surgery
    Hussein, Nabil
    Lim, Andrew
    Honjo, Osami
    Haller, Christoph
    Coles, John G.
    Van Arsdell, Glen
    Yoo, Shi-Joon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 160 (01): : 229 - 240
  • [9] Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery
    Barritt, Andrew W.
    Clark, Laura
    Cohen, Adam M. M.
    Hosangadi-Jayedev, Naveen
    Gibb, Paul A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [10] Vaginal axis on MRI after prolapse surgery - A randomized controlled trial
    Juliato, C.
    Santos Jr, L.
    Castro, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S59 - S60