Efficacy and safety of first-line combination therapy versus monotherapy for vitreoretinal lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Jing [1 ]
Peng, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Wang, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vitreoretinal lymphoma; Combination therapy; Monotherapy; BTK inhibitors; Meta-analysis; PRIMARY INTRAOCULAR LYMPHOMA; HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE; WHOLE-BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY; PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA; INTRAVITREAL METHOTREXATE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; CHEMOTHERAPY; TEMOZOLOMIDE; RITUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-023-03226-3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundVitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is usually treated with a combination of intraocular methotrexate (ioMTX), high-dose intravenous methotrexate (HD-MTX), or local radiotherapy (RT) as the first options. The effectiveness and safety of monotherapy like bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) for PVRL remain uncertain.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial data and conference abstracts in VRL patients treated with first-line combination therapy or monotherapy were conducted through a search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until December 2022. A total of 24 studies comprising 517 patients were included, and survival data were extracted from 279 patients due to inconsistent units across studies.ResultsThe combined treatment group used ioMTX + chemotherapy (in 4 studies), RT + chemotherapy (in 2 studies), ioMTX/HD-MTX based regimen (in 2 studies), ioMTX + RT + chemotherapy (in 2 studies), ioMTX + lenalidomide/BTKi (in 2 studies) and combination of multiple therapies (in 7 studies). The monotherapy group was mainly treated with oral monotherapies such as BTKi. The combination therapy had a higher overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) than monotherapy (ORR: 96% vs. 72%, CRR: 92% vs. 63%). Combination therapy also resulted in a longer median progression-free survival (28.8 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.012). However, the combination therapy group had more severe side effects (grade 3/4 toxicity) than the monotherapy group (45% vs. 8%).ConclusionThe study showed combination therapy had better OR and CR rates, longer survival, and more toxicity than monotherapy. While BTK inhibitors were well-tolerated, long-term effectiveness needs confirmation from prospective studies. In addition, given the small number of studies of monotherapy for VRL, more studies are needed to validate its effects.Trial registrationCRD42023400305.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of first-line combination therapy versus monotherapy for vitreoretinal lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing Gao
    Xiaoyan Peng
    Liang Wang
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 23
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis
    Lei, Qing
    Yan, Xin
    Zou, Huimin
    Jiang, Yixuan
    Lai, Yunfeng
    Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
    Hu, Hao
    [J]. DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis
    Qing Lei
    Xin Yan
    Huimin Zou
    Yixuan Jiang
    Yunfeng Lai
    Carolina Oi Lam Ung
    Hao Hu
    [J]. Discover Oncology, 13
  • [4] Efficacy of first-line combination therapies versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Huang, Wen-Kuan
    Hung, Yu-Liang
    Tsai, Chun-Yi
    Wu, Chiao-En
    Chou, Wen-Chi
    Hsu, Jun-Te
    Yeh, Ta-Sen
    Chen, Jen-Shi
    Wang, Shang-Yu
    Yeh, Chun-Nan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Jiting
    Su, Song
    Li, Jun
    Li, Yaling
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Metronidazole Monotherapy versus Vancomycin Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Rui
    Lu, Laichun
    Lin, Yu
    Wang, Mingxia
    Liu, Xin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [7] A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy or combination therapy as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Wang, Zhan
    Wang, Miao-Miao
    Zhou, Wen-Li
    Ye, Chen-Yang
    Dai, Wei-Ping
    Liu, Xin-Ling
    Zhang, Gui-Min
    Cheng, Guo-Liang
    Zang, Yuan-Sheng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (08) : 1567 - 1574
  • [8] A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy or combination therapy as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Zhan Wang
    Miao-Miao Wang
    Wen-Li Zhou
    Chen-Yang Ye
    Wei-Ping Dai
    Xin-Ling Liu
    Gui-Min Zhang
    Guo-Liang Cheng
    Yuan-Sheng Zang
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2020, 35 : 1567 - 1574
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Phenobarbitone as First-Line Treatment for Neonatal Seizure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kumar, Jogender
    Meena, Jitendra
    Yadav, Jaivinder
    Saini, Lokesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 67 (01)
  • [10] First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension
    Garjon, Javier
    Carlos Saiz, Luis
    Azparren, Ana
    Gaminde, Idoia
    Jose Ariz, Ma
    Erviti, Juan
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (02):