Effect of alveolar ridge preservation on peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis prevalence: A multicenter, cross-sectional study

被引:3
|
作者
Nino, Buonocunto [1 ]
Chiara, Cinquini [1 ]
Eitan, Mijiritsky [2 ,3 ]
Nirit, Tagger-Green [4 ]
Annamaria, Porreca [5 ]
Marta, Di Nicola [5 ]
Giovanna, Iezzi [5 ]
Antonio, Barone [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg Med Mol Pathol & Crit Area, Pisa, Italy
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol,Head & Neck Maxillofacial Surg, Tel aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Tel aviv, Israel
[5] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Med Oral & Biotechnol Sci, Chieti, Italy
[6] Univ Pisa, St Chiara Hosp Pisa, via Roma 67, Bldg 10D, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
关键词
alveolar ridge preservation; dental implant; mucositis; peri-implantitis; EXTRACTION SOCKETS; CONSENSUS REPORT; WORLD WORKSHOP; CLASSIFICATION; SOFT; COMPLICATIONS; HEALTH; SITES;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13240
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAlveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is a procedure with the aim to reduce bone resorption that occurs after tooth extraction, facilitating the following implant placement. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis around implants inserted in sites treated with ARP and to investigate possible risk factors. Materials and methodsPatients who received at least one dental implant inserted in a grafted socket were considered eligible for this study. Patients were recalled for a follow-up visit; medical history, clinical and demographic data were collected. Univariate logistic regression analyses have been performed for both implant-level and patient-level variables. Indeed, moderation analysis was used to investigate the indirect relationship between age and marginal bone level. ResultsFifty-one patients who received 61 implants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Thirty-three implants were classified as "healthy" (54.1%), 23 implants showed signs of peri-implant mucositis (37.7%), and 5 implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis (8.2%). Data analyzed at the patient level showed that 49% of the patients were healthy, 45.1% of the patients had mucositis and 5.9% of the patients were affected by peri-implantitis. Mandibular sites and type III grafted sockets showed a significant association with peri-implantitis; in addition, a history of periodontitis and an increase in age showed higher risks of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis. ConclusionsImplants inserted in grafted sockets showed favorable rates of healthy implants in the long term. Clinical relevanceThe ridge preservation procedures do not seem to increase the risk of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1055
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevalence, risk indicators, and clinical characteristics of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis for an internal conical connection implant system: A multicenter cross-sectional study
    Apaza-Bedoya, Karin
    Galarraga-Vinueza, Maria Elisa
    Correa, Bruna Barbosa
    Schwarz, Frank
    Bianchini, Marco Aurelio
    Magalhaes Benfatti, Cesar Augusto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2024, 95 (06) : 582 - 593
  • [2] Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Figuero, Elena
    Graziani, Filippo
    Sanz, Ignacio
    Herrera, David
    Sanz, Mariano
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2014, 66 (01) : 255 - 273
  • [3] Histological evaluation of peri-implant mucosal and gingival tissues in peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis and periodontitis patients: a cross-sectional clinical study
    Karatas, Ozkan
    Yuce, Hatice Balci
    Taskan, Mehmet Murat
    Gevrek, Fikret
    Lafci, Emre
    Kasap, Hayrunnisa
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 78 (04) : 241 - 249
  • [4] Animal models for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Schwarz, Frank
    Sculean, Anton
    Engebretson, Steven P.
    Becker, Juergen
    Sager, Martin
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2015, 68 (01) : 168 - 181
  • [5] Treatment modalities for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Renvert, Stefan
    Polyzois, Ioannis
    Persson, G. Rutger
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2013, 26 (06): : 313 - 318
  • [6] Clinical characteristics of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Ramanauskaite, Ausra
    Becker, Kathrin
    Schwarz, Frank
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (06) : 551 - 556
  • [7] Clinical approaches to treat peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Renvert, Stefan
    Polyzois, Ioannis N.
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2015, 68 (01) : 369 - 404
  • [8] Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: key features and differences
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 236 (10) : 791 - 794
  • [9] Prevalence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis among implant patients: A dental university based study
    Labh, Ankita Komal
    Bennis, Marian Anand
    Mani, Geo
    [J]. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 2021, 31 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [10] Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: Managing peri-implant mucositis
    Jepsen, Soren
    Berglundh, Tord
    Genco, Robert
    Aass, Anne Merete
    Demirel, Korkud
    Derks, Jan
    Figuero, Elena
    Giovannoli, Jean Louis
    Goldstein, Moshe
    Lambert, France
    Ortiz-Vigon, Alberto
    Polyzois, Ioannis
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Serino, Giovanni
    Tomasi, Cristiano
    Zitzmann, Nicola U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 : S152 - S157