The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation

被引:5
|
作者
Finnegan, Alan [1 ]
Salem, Kate [1 ]
Moore, Lottie Ainsworth- [1 ]
Randles, Rebecca [1 ]
West, Lauren
Simpson, Robin [2 ]
Grant, Veronica Benedicta [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chester, Westminster Ctr Res Vet, Chester, England
[2] Hampton Surg, Solihull, England
[3] Darley Dale Med Ctr, Matlock, England
关键词
health promotion; mental health; general practice; primary healthcare; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; CKD; POPULATION; MEDICINE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services.Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accreditation programme, focusing on benefits for the veteran, the practice, and the delivery of the programme itself.Design & setting: The study evaluated the views of veteran-friendly accredited GP practices across England.Method: A mixed-methods study was undertaken, which collected data via an online survey from 232 accredited primary healthcare (PHC) staff and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC veteran leads. Interviews were analysed using modified grounded theory.Results: The study found 99% (n = 228) of responders would recommend the programme, 78% (n = 180) reported improved awareness, and 84% (n = 193) a better understanding of veterans' needs. Seventy- two per cent (n = 166) identified benefits for veterans who were engaging more with PHC but participants felt more time was needed, largely owing to the COVID- 19 pandemic, to fully assess the impact of the programme on help-seeking behaviour. Challenges included identifying veterans already registered, promoting the accreditation process, and ensuring all PHC staff were kept up to date with veteran issues.Conclusion: The programme has increased signposting to veteran-specific services and resulted in greater understanding of the NHS priority referral criteria for veterans. Recording of veteran status has improved and there was evidence of a better medical record coding system in PHC practices. These findings add to the limited empirical evidence exploring veteran engagement in PHC, and demonstrate how accreditation results in better treatment and identification of veterans.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Dementia Actif, a dementia-friendly exercise and wellbeing programme: mixed-methods study
    Davies, Ceryl Teleri
    LANCET, 2023, 402 : 37 - 37
  • [2] Mixed-methods evaluation of a leadership development programme for higher specialist trainees
    Healey, Christine
    Fearnley, David
    Chivers, Mandy
    Wadoo, Ovais
    Kinderman, Peter
    PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2012, 36 (10): : 386 - 390
  • [3] A mixed-methods evaluation of an intrapartum fetal monitoring training programme in India
    Lightly, Kate
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Tadas, Moushmi
    Faragher, Emeritus Brian
    Alfirevic, Emeritus Zarko
    Scott, Hazel
    Weeks, Andrew
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 126 - 126
  • [4] A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation
    Al-alawy, Khamis
    Moonesar, Immanuel Azaad
    Obaid, Hanan Ali Mubarak
    Gaafar, Reem
    Bawadi, Ehab Ismail Al-Abed
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2021, 58
  • [5] Electronic Clinical Communications Implementation (ECCI) in Scotland: a mixed-methods programme evaluation
    Pagliari, C
    Gilmour, M
    Sullivan, F
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [6] Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care
    Sperber, Nina R.
    Miech, Edward J.
    Clary, Alecia Slade
    Perry, Kathleen
    Edwards-Orr, Merle
    Rudolph, James L.
    Van Houtven, Courtney Harold
    Thomas, Kali S.
    HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [7] Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Washington State Practice Transformation Support Hub
    Kwan-Gett, Tao Sheng
    Albertson, Elaine Michelle
    Banks, Jordan
    Revere, Debra
    Rogers, Megan
    Baseman, Janet
    Andris, Lydia
    Conrad, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (05): : 484 - 491
  • [8] A Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation of a Dementia-Friendly Congregation Program for Black Churches
    Gore, Janelle
    Toliver, Jamilla
    Moore, Miranda A.
    Aycock, Dawn
    Epps, Fayron
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [9] Evaluation of the digital diabetes prevention programme pilot: uncontrolled mixed-methods study protocol
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Daff, Kerry
    Lavida, Anthi
    Henley, William
    Irwin, Jenny
    Valabhji, Jonathan
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [10] A mixed-methods evaluation of prospective acceptability for a family-targeted programme promoting healthy lifestyles
    Bell, Lauren
    Whelan, Maxine
    Thomas, Lucie
    Wright, Hayley
    Lycett, Deborah
    Mckinnon, Gemma
    Southan, Jo
    Patel, Riya
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 32 (09): : 1815 - 1828