Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Kirvin-Quamme, Andrew [1 ]
Kissinger, Jennifer [1 ]
Quinlan, Laurel [1 ]
Montgomery, Robert [1 ]
Chernenok, Mariya [1 ]
Pirner, Maddison C. [1 ]
Pajarito, Sarah [1 ]
Rapoport, Stephanie [1 ]
Wicks, Paul [2 ]
Darcy, Alison [1 ]
Greene, Carolyn J. [3 ]
Robinson, Athena [1 ]
机构
[1] Woebot Hlth, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
[2] Wicks Digital Hlth Ltd, Lichfield, England
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Translat Res Inst TRI, Little Rock, AR USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
MENTAL HEALTH; Health Equity; Systematic Review; Randomized Controlled Trial; DEPRESSION; GENDER; ANXIETY; STIGMA; DISPARITIES; MINORITIES; INCLUSION; ILLNESS; TRIALS; RACE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The ability of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) to reduce mental health disparities relies on the recruitment of research participants with diverse sociodemographic and self-identity characteristics. Despite its importance, sociodemographic reporting in research is often limited, and the state of reporting practices in DMHI research in particular has not been comprehensively reviewed. Objectives To characterise the state of sociodemographic data reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of app-based DMHIs published globally from 2007 to 2022. Methods A scoping review of RCTs of app-based DMHIs examined reporting frequency for 16 sociodemographic domains (eg, gender) and common category options within each domain (eg, woman). The search queried five electronic databases. 5079 records were screened and 299 articles were included. Results On average, studies reported 4.64 (SD=1.79; range 0-9) of 16 sociodemographic domains. The most common were age (97%) and education (67%). The least common were housing situation (6%), residency/location (5%), veteran status (4%), number of children (3%), sexual orientation (2%), disability status (2%) and food security (<1%). Gender or sex was reported in 98% of studies: gender only (51%), sex only (28%), both (<1%) and gender/sex reported but unspecified (18%). Race or ethnicity was reported in 48% of studies: race only (14%), ethnicity only (14%), both (10%) and race/ethnicity reported but unspecified (10%). Conclusions This review describes the widespread underreporting of sociodemographic information in RCTs of app-based DMHIs published from 2007 to 2022. Reporting was often incomplete (eg, % female only), unclear (eg, the conflation of gender/sex) and limited (eg, only options representing majority groups were reported). Trends suggest reporting has somewhat improved in recent years. Diverse participant populations must be welcomed and described in DMHI research to broaden learning and the generalisability of results, a prerequisite of DMHI's potential to reduce disparities in mental healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review
    Sean A. Kidd
    Larry Davidson
    Kwame McKenzie
    [J]. Community Mental Health Journal, 2017, 53 : 627 - 637
  • [2] Common Factors in Community Mental Health Intervention: A Scoping Review
    Kidd, Sean A.
    Davidson, Larry
    McKenzie, Kwame
    [J]. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 53 (06) : 627 - 637
  • [3] The role of sociodemographic factors on the acceptability of digital mental health care: A scoping review protocol
    Abouzeid, Nagi
    Lal, Shalini
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [4] Boxing as an Intervention in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
    Bozdarov, Johny
    Jones, Brett D. M.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Husain, M. Ishrat
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE, 2023, 17 (04) : 589 - 600
  • [5] Mental health intervention research in Latin American correctional settings: A scoping review
    Beigel, Lukas
    Forrester, Andrew
    Torales, Julio
    Aboaja, Anne
    Rivera Aroyo, Guillermo
    Roche, Marcelo O'Higgins
    Opitz-Welke, Annette
    Mundt, Adrian P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 69 (07) : 1560 - 1577
  • [6] Service user's actual involvement in mental health research practices: A scoping review
    Sangill, Carina
    Buus, Niels
    Hybholt, Lisbeth
    Berring, Lene Lauge
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 28 (04) : 798 - 815
  • [7] Data communication practices for reporting health care outcomes to improve quality of care: A scoping review
    Ali, M.
    Visser, E.
    West, R.
    Noord, D. V.
    Woude, C. J. V. D.
    Deen, W. V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2024, 18 : I1086 - I1086
  • [8] Sociodemographic reporting in videomics research: a review of practices in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery
    Kim, Yeo Eun
    Serpedin, Aisha
    Periyakoil, Preethi
    German, Daniel
    Rameau, Anais
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] Adherence to implementation strategy reporting recommendations in mental health: a scoping review
    Hooley, Cole
    Amano, Takashi
    Markovitz, Lara
    Proctor, Enola
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [10] Adherence to implementation strategy reporting recommendations in mental health: a scoping review
    Hooley, Cole
    Amano, Takashi
    Markovitz, Lara
    Proctor, Enola
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13