The influential ambit of optimal corporate social responsibility investments on the cost of capital in Chinese private firms

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Naiping [1 ]
Khan, Talat Mehmood [1 ]
Khan, Tehmina [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
[2] RMIT Univ, Coll Business, Sch Accounting Informat Syst & Supply Chain, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
cost of debt; cost of equity; CSR over-investment; optimal CSR; state-owned shares; RISK-MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; OWNERSHIP; GOVERNANCE; EQUITY; DETERMINANTS; INSTITUTIONS; FINANCE; DEBT;
D O I
10.1002/sd.2949
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Private firms in China are contributing immensely to the country's economic growth. However, increasing the capital cost of private firms in China is a big challenge that needs to be addressed. This study intends to examine the role of optimal corporate social responsibility (CSR) investment while lowering the cost of equity capital and debt capital in Chinese private firms. In addition, this research study reveals the moderating role of state-owned shares in the association between CSR and private firms' capital costs. By taking a sample of Chinese private firms from 2011 to 2021, this study employs the CSR optimization method. The findings show that CSR optimization tends to reduce the cost of equity capital and debt capital in Chinese private firms. Further investigation shows that over-investment in CSR increases the cost of capital. Moreover, an increase in state-owned shares strengthens the negative relationship between the cost of debt capital and optimal CSR investments. The present study's findings are helpful for Chinese firms to undertake optimal CSR investment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Social Responsibility in Chinese Private Firms
    Li, Na
    Su, Qi
    Li, Xinchun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 2: ECONOMIC POLICIES, PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT, 2009, : 36 - 39
  • [2] Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms
    Xu, Shan
    Liu, Duchi
    Huang, Jianbai
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 40 (02) : 245 - 276
  • [3] Corporate social responsibility of Chinese firms and its impacts on corporate social capital: An empirical study based on 1268 manufacture firms investigation
    Xu Shangkun
    Yang Rudai
    Dai Xiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 704 - 704
  • [4] Chinese Merchant Group Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China
    Wang, Haifei
    Wu, Hongjun
    Humphreys, Peter
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [5] Chinese Private Corporate Philanthropy: Social Responsibility, Legitimacy Strategy, and the Role of Political Capital
    Chen, Zongshi
    Cao, Yang
    [J]. CHINESE SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 48 (02) : 108 - 136
  • [6] Do venture capital firms promote corporate social responsibility?
    Li, Jiu-Jin
    Xu, Chang
    Fung, Hung-Gay
    Chan, Kam C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 71 : 718 - 732
  • [7] Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    Kwok, Chuck C. Y.
    Mishra, Dev R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (09) : 2388 - 2406
  • [8] On the link between strategic option and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Chinese private firms
    Chen Honghui
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGE AND MANAGEMENT TRANSFORMATION, VOLS I - III, 2007, : 1283 - 1289
  • [9] What Explains Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement in Chinese Firms?
    Kao, Erin H.
    Fung, Hung-Gay
    Li, Qingdi
    [J]. CHINESE ECONOMY, 2014, 47 (5-6) : 50 - 80
  • [10] CLAN CULTURE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CHINESE FAMILY FIRMS
    Zhang, Guangli
    Xue, Huili
    Gao, Hao
    Liu, Xiaoyuan
    [J]. SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 69 (01): : 119 - 139