Survey Attention and Self-Reported Political Behavior

被引:3
|
作者
Alvarez, R. Michael [1 ]
Li, Yimeng [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Polit & Computat Social Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Tallahassee, FL USA
[3] Dept Polit Sci, 113 Collegiate Loop, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfac048
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Survey research methodology is evolving rapidly, as new technologies provide new opportunities. One of the areas of innovation regards the development of online interview best practices and the advancement of methods that allow researchers to measure the attention that respondents are devoting to the survey task. Reliable measurement of respondent attention can yield important information about the quality of the survey response. In this article, we take advantage of an innovative survey we conducted in 2018, in which we directly connect survey responses to administrative data, allowing us to assess the association between survey attention and response quality. We show that attentive survey respondents are more likely to provide accurate survey responses regarding a number of behaviors and attributes that we can validate with our administrative data. We discuss the best strategy to deal with inattentive respondents in surveys in light of our results.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 811
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-reported political ideology
    Yeung, Eddy S. F.
    Quek, Kai
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2024,
  • [2] Self-Reported Rationing Behavior Among US Physicians: A National Survey
    Sheeler, Robert D.
    Mundell, Tim
    Hurst, Samia A.
    Goold, Susan Dorr
    Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Danis, Marion
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (12) : 1444 - 1451
  • [3] Self-Reported Rationing Behavior Among US Physicians: A National Survey
    Robert D. Sheeler
    Tim Mundell
    Samia A. Hurst
    Susan Dorr Goold
    Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
    Jon C. Tilburt
    Marion Danis
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 1444 - 1451
  • [4] The Difference Between Self-Reported and Perceived Survey Measures and the Implications for Political Socialization Research
    Boonen, Joris
    Quintelier, Ellen
    Hooghe, Marc
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2017, 5 (02) : 367 - 378
  • [5] Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits
    Poynter, William
    Ingram, Paul
    Minor, Scott
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2010, 72 (03) : 355 - 361
  • [6] A survey of acute self-reported infections in pregnancy
    Lain, Samantha J.
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Warning, Julia
    Vivian-Taylor, Josephine
    Ford, Jane B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (01):
  • [7] Developing a Self-Reported Physical Fitness Survey
    Keith, Nicole R.
    Stump, Timothy E.
    Clark, Daniel O.
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2012, 44 (07) : 1388 - 1394
  • [8] Black tea improves attention and self-reported alertness
    De Bruin, E. A.
    Rowson, M. J.
    Van Buren, L.
    Rycroft, J. A.
    Owen, G. N.
    [J]. APPETITE, 2011, 56 (02) : 235 - 240
  • [9] Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention
    Murphy, Jennifer
    Brewer, Rebecca
    Plans, David
    Khalsa, Sahib S.
    Catmur, Caroline
    Bird, Geoffrey
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (01): : 115 - 133
  • [10] Self-reported cheating in web surveys on political knowledge
    Jensen, Carsten
    Thomsen, Jens Peter Frolund
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (06) : 3343 - 3354