Comprehension and Decision-Making Capacity Questionnaire About Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Study

被引:2
|
作者
Trevizan, Fulvio Bergamo [1 ]
Paiva, Carlos Eduardo [1 ]
Juliao, Miguel [2 ]
de Oliveira Valentino, Talita Caroline [1 ]
Miwa, Michelle Uchida [1 ]
Mingardi, Mirella [1 ]
Preto, Daniel D'Almeida [1 ]
Ciorlia, Juliana Beraldo [1 ]
de Angelis Nascimento, Maria Salete [3 ]
Kovacs, Maria Julia [4 ]
Dadalto, Luciana [5 ]
de Oliveira, Livia Costa [6 ]
da Costa Rosa, Karla Santos [6 ]
Ribeiro Paiva, Bianca Sakamoto [1 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, GPQual Res Grp Palliat Care & Qual Life, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Community Support Team Palliat Care Sintra, Sintra, Portugal
[3] Barretos Canc Hosp, Barretos, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Psychol Learning Dev & Personal Psychol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Ctr Univ Newton Paiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[6] Natl Canc Inst Jose Alencar Gomes da Silva INCA, Palliat Care Unit, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
comprehension; decision; palliative care; advance care planning; questionnaire; Delphi study; PATIENT AUTONOMY; CONSENSUS; RECOMMENDATIONS; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1177/08258597221128676
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective(s) To develop a questionnaire that assesses the level of comprehension and decision-making capacity of patients with breast cancer about palliative care and advance care planning. Methods: Questionnaire items were based on the scientific literature. Delphi Consensus, a three-round survey with experts (n = 14), evaluated the relevance, clarity, and redundancies of the items. A pretest with breast cancer patients (n = 15) evaluated whether they comprehended each item and identified doubts or discomforts. Results: The initial questionnaire was composed of 38 items. After the Delphi, 18 items were restructured, six were added, and 16 were removed. In the pretest phase, all items with the survey header, guidelines, and Likert model were evaluated. All items accomplished >= 80% cut-off score and were kept as in the original version. The final version of the questionnaire have 28 itens and five domains: determination, responsibility, independence, self-knowledge, and knowledge of reality. Conclusions: This study represents the first step in the development of a questionnaire that may be used in oncology clinical practice. The main findings revealed that Delphi and pretesting increased the quality of the questionnaire, making it compelling to assess breast cancer patients' comprehension and decision-making capacity about PC and ACP.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Talking about future decision-making capacity and advance care planning in diagnosis disclosure of dementia COMMENT
    Anantapong, Kanthee
    Davies, Nathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2021, 33 (11) : 1119 - 1121
  • [2] Advance care decision making and planning
    Tran, Michael
    Grant, Matthew
    Clayton, Josephine
    Rhee, Joel
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 47 (11) : 753 - 757
  • [3] Assessing decision-making capacity in the setting of palliative care research
    Casarett, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (04) : S6 - S13
  • [4] Decision-making in palliative care: the Mental Capacity Act 2005
    Mann, Theresa
    Cornock, Marc A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2007, 13 (08) : 402 - 407
  • [5] Finding Their Voice: Advance Care Planning for Children and Young Adults Without Decision-Making Capacity
    Downing, Amy
    Dombrowski, Dana
    Battista, Vanessa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 397 - 397
  • [6] A Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Physicians' Roles in Decision-Making About Euthanasia
    Belanger, Emmanuelle
    Towers, Anna
    Tradounsky, Golda
    Ghoche, Roger
    Wright, David
    Macdonald, Mary Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E56 - E56
  • [7] Advance care planning by proxy for residents of long-term care facilities who lack decision-making capacity
    Volicer, L
    Cantor, MD
    Derse, AR
    Edwards, DM
    Prudhomme, AM
    Gregory, DCR
    Reagan, JE
    Tulsky, JA
    Fox, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (04) : 761 - 767
  • [8] Evaluation of the Utility of the Advance Care Planning and Decision-Making Supportive Tool
    Slezackova, A.
    Malatincova, T.
    Rusinova, K.
    Kopecky, O.
    Kure, J.
    [J]. ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2022, 33 (3-4): : 141 - 147
  • [9] Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
    Rosca, Ana
    Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle
    Kasper, Juergen
    Rogger, Niek
    Drewniak, Daniel
    Krones, Tanja
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [10] Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
    Ana Rosca
    Isabelle Karzig-Roduner
    Jürgen Kasper
    Niek Rogger
    Daniel Drewniak
    Tanja Krones
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 24