Ownership structure and eco-innovation: Evidence from Chinese family firms

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Fangjun [1 ]
Wang, Xuanzi [1 ]
Li, Boying [2 ]
Liu, Yang S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Int Relat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Whiteknights RG6 6UD, Reading, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Family firms; Socioemotional wealth; Financial wealth; Ownership structure; Eco; -innovation; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; BEHAVIORAL AGENCY; CARBON EMISSIONS; PANEL-DATA; PERFORMANCE; GREEN; SHAREHOLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102158
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Although eco-innovation is typically less economically appealing due to double externalities, it provides initiators with the socioemotional wealth of green reputation and social capital, which family owners may be willing to preserve through economic concessions. We argue that the separation of voting rights and cash flow rights of family ownership eases the tension between socioemotional wealth and financial wealth for family owners. When family owners have a high level of rights separation, they benefit more from eco-innovation in terms of socioemotional wealth while requiring fewer economic concessions; as a result, they are more likely to invest in eco-innovation. The data on Chinese listed family firms supports our hypothesis, and this relationship is more pronounced in years with more prominent environmental concerns, among larger firms, and in firms with political capital. Our findings highlight the role of ownership structure in influencing the tension between socioemotional wealth and financial wealth, which is a key consideration in family firms' decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eco-Innovation and Firms' Performance: The Mediating Role of Eco-Innovation Strategy
    Kafetzopoulos, Dimitrios
    Gianni, Maria
    Samara, Elpida
    Kilintzis, Pavlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [2] Firms' growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: evidence from a sample of European firms
    Colombelli, Alessandra
    Krafft, Jackie
    Quatraro, Francesco
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 56 (04) : 1721 - 1738
  • [3] Firms’ growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: evidence from a sample of European firms
    Alessandra Colombelli
    Jackie Krafft
    Francesco Quatraro
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2021, 56 : 1721 - 1738
  • [4] Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms
    Marzucchi, Alberto
    Montresor, Sandro
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 131 : 208 - 221
  • [5] The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation
    Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria
    Aibar-Guzman, Cristina
    Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 158
  • [6] Small firms key to eco-innovation
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2010, 12 (09): : 1649 - 1649
  • [7] Nonfinancial Considerations in Eco-Innovation Decisions: The Role of Family Ownership and Reputation Concerns
    Bammens, Yannick
    Huenermund, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 37 (05) : 431 - 453
  • [8] The "Booster" of Corporate Eco-Innovation: Government Pressure Perceived by Chinese Private Firms
    Li, Changbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 2022
  • [9] Four types of eco-innovation for Baltic firms
    Biscione, Antonella
    de Felice, Annunziata
    Gallucci, Teodoro
    Lagioia, Giovanni
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 196 - 212
  • [10] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNOLOGICAL ECO-INNOVATION CAPACITY AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM MOST INNOVATIVE FIRMS IN THE USA
    Martins Oliveira, Selma Regina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE (IMC 2019), 2019, : 163 - 178