International research collaboration: is Africa different? A cross-country panel data analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Cerdeira, Jorge [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Mesquita, Joao [3 ]
Vieira, Elizabeth S. S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Inst Sociol, Via Panoram, P-4150564 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Letras, Via Panoram, P-4150564 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ciencias Comp, Rua Campo Alegre, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Ciencias, LAQV REQUIMTE, Dept Ciencias Comp, Rua Campo Alegre, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Porto, Ctr Econ & Financas, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, P-4200464 Porto, Portugal
关键词
International research collaboration; Barriers; Africa; Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood; SCIENCE-AND-TECHNOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; NORTH-SOUTH; GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PATTERNS; INFORMATION; NETWORKS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-023-04659-9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
International research collaboration (IRC) has been relevant for the development of national scientific systems. In Africa, given the limited resources devoted to research and development (R&D) activities and the crucial role that scientific knowledge generated through research activities can have in socioeconomic development, IRC may be an opportunity to strengthen scientific capabilities. While geographical, economic, political/governance, cultural, intellectual and excellence distance hampers IRC in other regions, we argue that economic and excellence distances actuate differently in Africa. We explored the impact of the variables above in addition to the information and communication technologies (ICTs), and social distances on the IRC of these countries. Using panel data for 54 African economies, our results show that economic distance fosters IRC while governance and excellence distances are non-significant. Past collaborations (one out of two proxies for social distance) and speaking the same language have the highest effect on IRC, and ICTs distance the lowest. The results have implications for science policy in Africa. For instance, we argue that science policies need to be adapted to each environment as the scientific landscape in each country is unique.
引用
收藏
页码:2145 / 2174
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International research collaboration: is Africa different? A cross-country panel data analysis
    Jorge Cerdeira
    João Mesquita
    Elizabeth S. Vieira
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 2145 - 2174
  • [2] Which distance dimensions matter in international research collaboration? A cross-country analysis by scientific domain
    Vieira, Elizabeth S.
    Cerdeira, Jorge
    Teixeira, Aurora A. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2022, 16 (02)
  • [3] Sources of Corruption in Authoritarian Regimes: A Cross-Country Panel Data Analysis
    Jung, Suehyun
    [J]. ASIAN PERSPECTIVE, 2022, 46 (04) : 733 - 753
  • [4] The impact of media on entrepreneurship participation: a cross-country panel data analysis
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Saleem, Sharjeel
    Raoof, Rabeeya
    Sultana, Naheed
    [J]. BOTTOM LINE, 2021, 34 (02): : 124 - 142
  • [5] The moderating role of informatization between country risks and international tourism: A cross-country panel analysis
    Deng, Zhaoming
    Zhou, Meijing
    Xu, Qiong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [7] Trust and economic performance Evidence from cross-country panel data analysis
    Niazi, Amna
    Hassan, Hamid
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2016, 26 (03) : 371 - 391
  • [8] Innovation dynamics in the EU: convergence or divergence? A cross-country panel data analysis
    Andre Jungmittag
    [J]. Empirical Economics, 2006, 31 : 313 - 331
  • [9] A cross-country panel analysis of currency substitution and trade
    Milner, C
    Mizen, P
    Pentecost, E
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2000, 38 (02) : 206 - 217
  • [10] DEMAND FOR INTERNATIONAL RESERVES - CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS
    CLARK, PB
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 3 (04): : 577 - 594