As most reference crop evapotranspiration (ETref) estimates are computed from weather stations located outside irrigated plots, the site aridity can produce ETref overestimation. To obtain more reliable ETref estimates, the potential of using the methodology that corrects the observed air and dew point temperatures was first analyzed in this study, and the meteorological conditions that limit this methodology implementation were subsequently assessed. A statistical analysis was conducted of pairwise comparisons between a station under reference conditions (Montanana) and four nearby stations affected by aridity in Spain for 2020. The daily reference evapotranspiration was calculated with the FAO56 Penman-Monteith equation (ETo PM), and afterward, the corrected daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo PMcor) was obtained using the previously mentioned correction methodology. The statistical analysis showed a greater connection between ETref and ETo PMcor in all pairwise comparisons, with the strongest connection reached between ETref Montanana station and ETo PMcor Pastriz station (coefficient of determination r(2) = 0.98 and root mean square error RMSE = 0.34 mm/day.). This ETo PM correction methodology was established considering a difference between the minimum temperature (Tmin) and the dew point temperature (Tdew) greater than 2 & DEG;C, as this value is considered the benchmark of aridity, but this research found that high aridity (P/ETo < 0.5) inland locations and high aridity coastal locations with high relative humidity (RH), markedly as of 61.5% and 68%, respectively, could exhibit days where Tmin-Tdew < 2 & DEG;C does not reflect well-watered soil and healthy grass but rather high RH levels (r(2) = 0.77 and 0.57, respectively). As this correction methodology was not established considering Tmin-Tdew values smaller than 2 & DEG;C, the application scope of this methodology is limited under the above scenarios.
