Distance-quality trade-off and choice of family planning provider in urban Pakistan

被引:1
|
作者
Hussain, Imtiaz [1 ]
Nausheen, Sidrah [2 ]
Rizvi, Arjumand [1 ]
Ansari, Uzair [1 ]
Baz, Mir [1 ]
Zehra, Kaneez [1 ]
Yameen, Sahar [1 ]
Hackett, Kristy [3 ]
Lassi, Zohra [1 ]
Canning, David [3 ]
Shah, Iqbal [3 ]
Soofi, Sajid Bashir [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Univ, Ctr Excellence Women & Child Hlth, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[2] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
[3] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
来源
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH | 2023年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
cross-sectional survey; distance of facility; family planning; quality of services; urban Pakistan; CONTRACEPTIVE USE; CARE;
D O I
10.1093/inthealth/ihac063
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background There is limited evidence between contraceptive use, availability of commodities and distance to the facility in developing countries. Distance to the facility is an essential determinant of contraceptive use. Still, women may not seek family planning services from the nearest facility and may be prepared to travel the farthest distance to receive quality family planning services. Methods We analyzed women's survey data linked to health facility data and applied an alternate specific conditional logit model to examine the distance a woman is prepared to travel and the quality of services offered by facilities in urban areas in Karachi, Pakistan. Results This study analyzed data from 336 women and 28 facilities and identified that the mean distance to the nearest facility was 0.44 km; the chosen facility was, on average, 5 km away. Women preferred facilities that offered a range of contraceptive methods and additional services provided by female healthcare providers only. Furthermore, on average, women are willing to travel a further 1.7 km for a facility that offers more family planning methods, 1.4 km for a facility that offers additional health services and 11 km for a facility that offers services delivered by female healthcare providers. Conclusions The findings highlight the quality measures women prioritize over distance and consider essential when choosing a family planning facility.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 434
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The distance-quality trade-off in women's choice of family planning provider in North Eastern Tanzania
    Elewonibi, Bilikisu
    Sato, Ryoko
    Manongi, Rachel
    Msuya, Sia
    Shah, Iqbal
    Canning, David
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (02):
  • [2] School choice: understanding the trade-off between travel distance and school quality
    He, Sylvia Y.
    Giuliano, Genevieve
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 45 (05) : 1475 - 1498
  • [3] School choice: understanding the trade-off between travel distance and school quality
    Sylvia Y. He
    Genevieve Giuliano
    [J]. Transportation, 2018, 45 : 1475 - 1498
  • [4] Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice
    Luce, MF
    Payne, JW
    Bettman, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (02) : 143 - 159
  • [5] Exploring the trade-off between quality and fairness in human partner choice
    Raihani, Nichola J.
    Barclay, Pat
    [J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2016, 3 (11):
  • [6] The Trade-Off between Quantity and Quality in Family Fertility Decision: Evidence from China's Family Planning Policy
    Wang, Shangao
    Tian, Xu
    Zhou, Yingheng
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2021, 16 (01) : 67 - 104
  • [7] Choice of a family planning outlet in urban areas: The role of distance and quality of services in Kenya and Uganda
    Winston, Jennifer
    Calhoun, Lisa M.
    Guilkey, David
    Macharia, Peter M.
    Speizer, Ilene S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 4
  • [8] What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice
    Determann, Domino
    Lambooij, Mattijs S.
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hayen, Arthur P.
    Varkevisser, Marco
    Schut, Frederik T.
    de Wit, G. Ardine
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 165 : 10 - 18
  • [9] Is the Quantity-Quality Trade-Off a Trade-Off for All, None, or Some?
    Millimet, Daniel L.
    Wang, Le
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2011, 60 (01) : 155 - 195
  • [10] Is There Really a Trade-Off? Family Size and Investment in Child Quality in India
    Azam, Mehtabul
    Saing, Chan Hang
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2018, 18 (01):