Determination of influential nodes based on the Communities? structure to maximize influence in social networks

被引:17
|
作者
Kazemzadeh, Farzaneh [1 ]
Safaei, Ali Asghar [2 ]
Mirzarezaee, Mitra [1 ]
Afsharian, Sanaz [3 ]
Kosarirad, Houman [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Med Informat, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, English Dept, Damavand Branch, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Durham Sch Architectural Engn & Construct, 122 NH, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
Social networks; Influence maximization; Influence spread; Optimal pruning; Minimum dominating nodes; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.059
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the increasing development of social networks, they have turned into important research platforms. Influence maximization is one of the most important research issues in the field of social networks. This problem detects influential k-node with the greatest influence spread. The influence maximization faces two important challenges, time efficiency and optimal selection of seed nodes. In order to solve such chal-lenges, we propose an algorithm based on optimal pruning and scoring adjustment, which is called IMBC for short. The IMBC (Influence Maximization Based on Community structure) algorithm uses optimal pruning and a minimum of dominating nodes to improve time efficiency. In addition, for optimal selec-tion of seed nodes, the IMBC algorithm modulates the scores of nodes with a high Rich-Club coefficient. In order to select influential nodes, we first select an optimal set using the minimum dominating nodes and node scores, with the aim of optimal pruning in influence spread calculations. Because large-scale social networks have many nodes, optimal pruning reduces computational overhead. Then, the seed nodes are selected based on the scoring adjustment. Scoring adjustment is done to avoid the Rich Club phenomenon because avoiding this phenomenon causes a large amount of diffusion in social networks. The experimen-tal results show that the proposed algorithm performs better than the algorithms presented in recent years in influence spread and runtime. Therefore, the IMBC algorithm is a balance between quality and efficiency. Also, in the PGP dataset results, the PHG algorithm with as much as a 5.08% increase in influ-ence spread, and the runtime has decreased by 97%.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 28
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying influential nodes based on ant colony optimization to maximize profit in social networks
    Salavati, Chiman
    Abdollahpouri, Alireza
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 51
  • [2] Discovering Most Influential Social Networks Nodes Based on Floating Influence
    Zeng Wei
    Li Chuan
    Feng Bingqing
    Yang Ning
    Luo Qian
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND BIG DATA (CCBD), 2014, : 144 - 147
  • [3] Detection of top-r spreader influential nodes on the Social Internet of Things networks to maximize spreading influence
    Ma, Te
    Lan, Lan
    Zong, Yanxia
    Arebi, Peyman
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2024, 139 (09):
  • [4] Prediction of influential nodes in social networks based on local communities and users' reaction information
    Rashidi, Rohollah
    Boroujeni, Farsad Zamani
    Soltanaghaei, Mohammadreza
    Farhadi, Hadi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Identification of influential nodes in social networks with community structure based on label propagation
    Zhao, Yuxin
    Li, Shenghong
    Jin, Feng
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 210 : 34 - 44
  • [6] Identifying influential nodes in social networks via community structure and influence distribution difference
    Zufan Zhang
    Xieliang Li
    Chenquan Gan
    [J]. Digital Communications and Networks., 2021, 7 (01) - 139
  • [7] Identifying influential nodes in social networks via community structure and influence distribution difference
    Zhang, Zufan
    Li, Xieliang
    Gan, Chenquan
    [J]. DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS, 2021, 7 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [8] Identifying Influential Nodes in Social Networks by Overlapping Community Structure
    Yetong, Wang
    Tao, Jiang
    [J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6 (12) : 80 - 89
  • [9] NodeRank: Finding influential nodes in social networks based on interests
    Bahutair, Mohammed
    Al Aghbari, Zaher
    Kamel, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2022, 78 (02): : 2098 - 2124
  • [10] NodeRank: Finding influential nodes in social networks based on interests
    Mohammed Bahutair
    Zaher Al Aghbari
    Ibrahim Kamel
    [J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2022, 78 : 2098 - 2124