Family inclusion in child protection: Knowledge, power and resistance

被引:5
|
作者
Davies, Kate [1 ,4 ]
Ross, Nicola [2 ]
Cocks, Jessica [3 ]
Foote, Wendy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Humanities Creat Ind & Social Sci, Callaghan, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Law Sch, Callaghan, Australia
[3] Life Barriers, Dandenong, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Sch Humanities Creat Ind & Social Sci, Univ Dr 2308, Callaghan, Australia
关键词
Family inclusion; Child protection; Parents; Foucault; Power; Australia; WELFARE SERVICES; PARENTS; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; ENGAGEMENT; FATHERS; HEALTH; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106860
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The inclusion of families throughout the child protection process can improve lifelong outcomes for children who have been removed from their parents' care. However, child protection authorities have struggled to prioritize principles of family inclusion within systems that position families as risky. While parents' experiences of powerlessness within child protection systems have been well documented, little is known about parents' perspectives on family inclusion specifically. We engaged six parents who had experienced removal of children from their care in interviews and focus groups as part of a larger study that examined practitioners', carers', lawyers' and parents' views on family inclusion in Australia. In this article we report on parents' experiences and recommendations for improving family inclusion. Through the analytical framework of Foucauldian concepts of power, knowledge and acts of resistance we highlight the complexities of parents' lives and intersections in their experiences of systemic and social exclusion. In identifying the importance of collaboration, decision making and parental identity these findings suggest that the advocacy of parents for inclusion in the lives of their children is an underutilized asset in child protection systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family inclusion in child protection: Law, courts and balancing risks
    Ross, Nicola
    Foote, Wendy
    Davies, Kate
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2024, 49 (03) : 198 - 204
  • [2] Family Inclusive Child Protection Practice: The History of the Family Inclusion Network and Beyond
    Ainsworth, Frank
    Berger, John
    [J]. CHILDREN AUSTRALIA, 2014, 39 (02) : 60 - 64
  • [3] Family planning and child protection
    Leenders, FM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING, 1999, 25 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [4] Review of Child Protection Training Uptake and Knowledge of Child Protection Guidelines
    Baverstock, Anna
    Bartle, David
    Boyd, Beverley
    Finlay, Fiona
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE REVIEW, 2008, 17 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [5] Transparency and 'uncomfortable knowledge' in child protection
    Bessant, Judith
    Broadley, Karen
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2016, 37 (02) : 93 - 112
  • [6] Family sustainability and child protection in Vietnam
    Spence, Nigel
    Lan, Nguyen Thi Thai
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 122
  • [7] SHARED FAMILY CARE - CHILD PROTECTION AND FAMILY PRESERVATION
    BARTH, RP
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 1994, 39 (05) : 515 - 524
  • [8] Exclusionary Inclusion? Peace Agreements and Provisions on Child Protection
    Molloy, Sean
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2023, 41 (04) : 432 - 451
  • [9] Voice, power and discourse: Experiences of participants in family group conferences in the context of child protection
    Ney, Tara
    Stoltz, Jo-Anne
    Maloney, Maureen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 13 (02) : 184 - 202
  • [10] Knowledge/Power/Resistance
    Stehr, Nico
    Adolf, Marian T.
    [J]. SOCIETY, 2018, 55 (02) : 193 - 198