Refining active learning design principles through design-based research

被引:9
|
作者
Reilly, Christiane [1 ]
Reeves, Thomas C. [2 ]
机构
[1] ReDesignED LLC, 12515 103rd St North, Stillwater, MN 55082 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Learning Design & Technol, Coll Educ, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
active learning; design-based research; design principles; learning design; online course review; ONLINE; QUALITY; WORK;
D O I
10.1177/14697874221096140
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This design-based research (DBR) study had both local and general goals. Its local goal was to increase active learning in the online courses offered at a large research university in the midwestern United States. Its larger goal was to define active learning design principles for online courses in general, so that they might be used to improve the learning experience for wider audiences. While the principles of active learning can be applied to courses in any mode of delivery: flipped classroom, blended, or fully online, the importance of active learning in online courses is highlighted because active learning course design requires numerous upfront considerations. Moreover, because the pedagogical model is structured throughout the online learning environment and thus is made visible, online courses present a unique opportunity to review what is core to the principles of active learning. The design intervention (an innovative course review method) incorporated the principles of authentic e-learning. The study addressed two major research questions: (1) "To what extent does the intervention-a new course review method-indicate the extent to which active learning is present in the design of an online course?" and (2) "How do the principles of authentic e-learning incorporated in the new course review method need to be refined?" To address the first question, the online course review intervention was used to evaluate the learning activities and assessments of 75 undergraduate online courses against these authentic e-learning principles, resulting in an active learning (AL) score for each course. To address the second question, we surveyed the learners in these 75 courses about what made learning meaningful and coded the learners' feedback in reference to the active learning design principles. The practical outcome of this DBR study is a pedagogical course review that quantifies active learning in online courses. The theoretical outcomes of this DBR study are refined active learning design principles that can serve instructors, designers, teacher educators, and administrators in enhancing the design of online courses. The findings of this study affirm that the authentic task principles as well as newly identified learner-centered design principles together can serve as evidence-based principles to define and refine active learning in online courses.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 100
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Refining Conjecture Mapping for Design-based Research
    Wu, Jing
    Chen, Victor Der-Thanq
    [J]. 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (ICCE 2018), 2018, : 767 - 771
  • [2] Identifying Design Principles for CS Teacher Ebooks through Design-Based Research
    Ericson, Barbara
    Rogers, Kantwon
    Parker, Miranda
    Morrison, Briana
    Guzdial, Mark
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH (ICER'16), 2016, : 191 - 200
  • [3] Exploring the Messiness of Design Principles in Design-Based Research
    Hanghoj, Thorkild
    Haendel, Vici Daphne
    Duedahl, Tina Visgaard
    Gundersen, Peter Bukovica
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LITERACY, 2022, 17 (04) : 222 - 233
  • [4] Design principles for simulation games for learning clinical reasoning: A design-based research approach
    Koivisto, J. -M.
    Haavisto, E.
    Niemi, H.
    Haho, P.
    Nylund, S.
    Multisilta, J.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 60 : 114 - 120
  • [5] Learning through interaction: Improving practice with design-based research
    Voigt, Christian
    Swatman, Paula M. C.
    [J]. INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2006, 3 (03) : 207 - +
  • [6] Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom
    Paul Kim
    Esther Suh
    Donggil Song
    [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2015, 63 : 575 - 602
  • [7] Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom
    Kim, Paul
    Suh, Esther
    Song, Donggil
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 63 (04): : 575 - 602
  • [8] Design-based research and the learning designer
    Seeto, Deidre
    Herrington, Jan
    [J]. WHO'S LEARNING? WHOSE TECHNOLOGY?, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 741 - 745
  • [9] Developing Mathematics and Science Teachers' Ability to Design for Active Learning: A Design-based Research Study
    Kickbusch, Steven
    Dawes, Les
    Kelly, Nick
    Nickels, Katherine
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (09): : 80 - 99
  • [10] Design principles to develop digital innovation skills: a design-based research approach
    Carolien van den Berg
    Vivienne Bozalek
    [J]. Educational technology research and development, 2024, 72 : 947 - 972