Carbon footprint of hospital laundry: a life-cycle assessment

被引:2
|
作者
John, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Collins, Michael [4 ]
O'Flynn, Kieran [2 ,5 ]
Briggs, Tim [2 ,6 ]
Gray, William [2 ]
McGrath, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Exeter, England
[2] NHS England, Getting Right First Time programme, London, England
[3] Royal Devon Univ Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Exeter, England
[4] Environm Resources Management, Prod Sustainabil, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] Northern Care Alliance NHS Fdn Trust, Salford, England
[6] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Surg, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
human resource management; organisation of health services; hospitals; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HEALTH; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080838
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a regional hospital laundry unit, and model ways in which these can be reduced.Design A cradle to grave process-based attributional life-cycle assessment.Setting A large hospital laundry unit supplying hospitals in Southwest England.Population All laundry processed through the unit in 2020-21 and 2021-22 financial years.Primary outcome measure The mean carbon footprint of processing one laundry item, expressed as in terms of the global warming potential over 100 years, as carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e).Results Average annual laundry unit GHG emissions were 2947 t CO2e. Average GHG emissions were 0.225 kg CO2e per item-use and 0.5080 kg CO2e/kg of laundry. Natural gas use contributed 75.7% of on-site GHG emissions. Boiler electrification using national grid electricity for 2020-2022 would have increased GHG emissions by 9.1%, however by 2030 this would reduce annual emissions by 31.9% based on the national grid decarbonisation trend. Per-item transport-related GHG emissions reduce substantially when heavy goods vehicles are filled at >= 50% payload capacity. Single-use laundry item alternatives cause significantly higher per-use GHG emissions, even if reusable laundry were transported long distances and incinerated at the end of its lifetime.Conclusions The laundry unit has a large carbon footprint, however the per-item GHG emissions are modest and significantly lower than using single-use alternatives. Future electrification of boilers and optimal delivery vehicle loading can reduce the GHG emissions per laundry item.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon Footprint of an Orchard Tractor through a Life-Cycle Assessment Approach
    Martelli, Salvatore
    Mocera, Francesco
    Soma, Aurelio
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [2] Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings
    Trovato, Maria Rosa
    Nocera, Francesco
    Giuffrida, Salvatore
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [3] Carbon footprint of bioplastics using biocarbon content analysis and life-cycle assessment
    Narayan, Ramani
    [J]. MRS BULLETIN, 2011, 36 (09) : 716 - 721
  • [4] Carbon footprint of bioplastics using biocarbon content analysis and life-cycle assessment
    Ramani Narayan
    [J]. MRS Bulletin, 2011, 36 : 716 - 721
  • [5] A database for the life-cycle assessment of Procter & Gamble laundry detergents
    Saouter, E
    van Hoof, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (02): : 103 - 114
  • [6] A database for the life-cycle assessment of procter & gamble laundry detergents
    Erwan Saouter
    Gert van Hoof
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 : 103 - 114
  • [7] Life-cycle carbon footprint analysis of magnesia products
    An, Jing
    Xue, Xiangxin
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 119 : 4 - 11
  • [8] A life-cycle carbon footprint of Yosemite National Park
    Villalba, Gara
    Tarnay, Leland
    Campbell, Elliott
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1336 - 1343
  • [9] Carbon Footprint of a Large Yellow Croaker Mariculture Models Based on Life-Cycle Assessment
    Liu, Jingyi
    Gui, Feng
    Zhou, Qian
    Cai, Huiwen
    Xu, Kaida
    Zhao, Sheng
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [10] Case Study on Carbon Footprint Life-Cycle Assessment for Construction Delivery Stage in China
    Li, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Chen
    Kassem, Mukhtar A.
    Wu, Shu-Yi
    Wei, Tai-Bing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)