U.S. SANCTIONS AGAINST CHINA AND RUSSIA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
Timofeev, Ivan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] MGIMO Univ, Moscow State Inst Int Relat, Minist Foreign Affairs Russian Federat, 76 Vernadskogo Prosp, Moscow 119454, Russia
来源
关键词
policy of sanctions; economic sanctions; export control; Russia; China; USA;
D O I
10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-11-70-79
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The U.S. foreign policy relies on the use of economic sanctions in relations with both China (PRC) and Russia (RF). The National Security Strategy of the United States identifies PRC and RF as significant threats to the U.S. However, the view of China concentrates on long-term trends, while Russia is an immediate challenge, especially after the launch of its Special Military Operation in Ukraine on February 2022. This difference must have a reflection on the level of sanctions policy against these two targets. The substance of such differences in terms of sanctions instruments in use as well as the quality and quantity of their implementation is central for this article. Another question is about the ways the U.S. Congress and Administration approach China and Russia in terms of sanctions. Are they really on the same page or do they compete in their approaches to Beijing and Moscow? In terms of methodology, Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) databases represent the major source for comparative analysis. Another source is the U.S. legal acts on sanctions against China and Russia and the practice of their implementation. The analysis reveals major differences in sanctions policy of the U.S. vis-a-vis the two adversaries. Washington implements much wider set of sanctions instruments against Russia in comparison with China. Major Russian companies and sectors of economy are the targets of different kinds of sanctions, while Chinese ones are targeted to a much less extent. The intensity of the use of sanctions is again much greater in the Russian case. Partisan differences in Congress on China are more salient than on Russia, however, disagreements are not critical in both cases. Further aggravation of Sino-American relations may mitigate the differences of sanctions against Russia and China in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE RHETORIC OF THE POLITICAL LEADERS OF RUSSIA AND THE U.S.: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Kasatkin, P., I
    Romanenko, A., V
    [J]. POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2019, (05): : 167 - 180
  • [2] THE U.S. SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN: EXPERIENCE AND EVENTUAL IMPLICATIONS
    Timofeev, I. N.
    [J]. POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2018, (04): : 56 - 71
  • [3] European Paradox: U.S. Sanctions against European Business
    Timofeev, I
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EUROPE-SOVREMENNAYA EVROPA, 2020, (02): : 45 - 55
  • [4] INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS LEGISLATION IN THE U.S., EU AND UK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Arapova, E. Ya
    Kudinov, A. S.
    [J]. POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2022, (06): : 151 - 165
  • [5] Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests
    Boulegue, Mathieu
    [J]. RUSI JOURNAL, 2022, 167 (6-7): : 96 - 97
  • [6] Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests
    Begovic, Boris
    Demarais, Agathe
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE FACULTY OF LAW IN BELGRADE, 2023, 71 (01):
  • [7] "SANCTIONS FOR SANCTIONS VIOLATION": U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST FINANCIAL SECTOR
    Timofeev, I. N.
    [J]. POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2020, (06): : 73 - 90
  • [8] EU vs. U.S. , Russia and China
    Feng Zhongping China Institute of Contemporary International Relations.
    [J]. Contemporary International Relations, 2002, (03) : 18 - 32
  • [9] U.S. Space Technology for Controlling China and Russia
    Gagnon, Bruce
    [J]. PEACE REVIEW-A JOURNAL OF SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2010, 22 (01): : 17 - 24
  • [10] U.S.,Europe and China in Russia's Foreign Policy
    Ji ZhiyeChina Institute for Contemporary International Studies Gao Yu
    [J]. International Understanding, 2003, (04) : 13 - 19