Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Societal Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Fuming [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yingyao [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Dunming [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Shan [3 ]
Yang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Natl Hlth Commiss, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Univ Business Sch, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer; Costs and cost analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Immunotherapy; Sintilimab; METASTATIC NONSQUAMOUS NSCLC; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHASE-3; PLATINUM;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-024-02808-x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe updated ORIENT-11 study demonstrated that sintilimab, when combined with chemotherapy, had promising survival advantage compared to standard chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment for previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy for advanced nsNSCLC from a Chinese societal perspective.MethodsA partitioned survival model with a embedded decision tree was developed to assess the economic value of sintilimab plus chemotherapy over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data was captured from the updated ORIENT-11 study, while costs, health productivity losses, and utility values were collected from a nationwide cross-sectional survey in tertiary hospitals across multiple provinces in China. The primary outcomes were measured using the metrics of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and scenario analyses, were performed.ResultsCompared to standard chemotherapy, treatment with sintilimab plus chemotherapy incurred a mean total cost of $23,979 and gained 0.98 QALYs over the lifetime horizon, resulting in an ICER of $24,568 per QALY gained. The use of sintilimab accumulated direct non-medical costs of $9262 and indirect costs of $6780 over 16 years. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed an 84.2% probability of sintilimab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective at a threshold of three times China's per capita gross domestic product in 2022 ($38,201). The model was most sensitive to the discount rate of QALYs and costs, as well as the costs of pemetrexed, sintilimab, and subsequent therapy in progressive disease state. Subgroup analyses indicated favorable incremental net monetary benefits in all subgroups.ConclusionSintilimab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective first-line treatment therapy for advanced nsNSCLC in China when compared to standard chemotherapy. These findings, along with the improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) observed in ORIENT-11, support the use of this regimen in eligible candidates for advanced nsNSCLC.
引用
收藏
页码:1436 / 1449
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Societal Perspective
    Fuming Li
    Yingyao Chen
    Dunming Xiao
    Shan Jiang
    Yi Yang
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2024, 41 : 1436 - 1449
  • [2] First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from China
    Yang, Zhiguang
    Zhu, Yumei
    Xiang, Guiyuan
    Hua, Tiantian
    Ni, Jun
    Zhao, Jie
    Lu, Yun
    Wu, Yingyu
    Chang, Feng
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (05) : 1061 - 1067
  • [3] The potential cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Roth, Joshua A.
    Trung Nguyen
    Goulart, Bernardo H. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [4] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ding, Dong
    Hu, Huabin
    Liao, Mengting
    Shi, Yin
    She, Longjiang
    Yao, Linli
    Zhu, Youwen
    Zeng, Shan
    Huang, Jin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2020, 37 (05) : 2116 - 2126
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Dong Ding
    Huabin Hu
    Mengting Liao
    Yin Shi
    Longjiang She
    Linli Yao
    Youwen Zhu
    Shan Zeng
    Jin Huang
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2020, 37 : 2116 - 2126
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China
    Liu, Huiqin
    Wang, Ying
    He, Qi
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
    Liang, Xueyan
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    Li, Huijuan
    Li, Yan
    [J]. IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2023, 15 (14) : 1133 - 1142
  • [8] A cost-effectiveness analysis of consolidative local therapy in oligometastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
    Panje, C. M.
    Dedes, K. J.
    Matter-Walstra, K.
    Schwenkglenks, M.
    Gautschi, O.
    Siano, M.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Plasswilm, L.
    Lupatsch, J. E.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 588 - 588
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED NON-SQUAMOUS NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) IN SAUDI ARABIA
    Alhammad, A.
    Lecca, Garrido S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A741 - A741
  • [10] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NIVOLUMAB PLUS IPILIMUMAB VS. PEMBROLIZUMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF NON-SQUAMOUS, ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN THE USA
    Chen, J.
    Velcheti, V.
    Padula, W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S342 - S342