Blood loss quantification during major abdominal surgery: prospective observational cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Zajak, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Paral, Jiri [1 ,2 ]
Sirovy, Miroslav [1 ,2 ]
Odlozilova, Sarka [1 ,2 ]
Vinklerova, Katerina [1 ]
Lochman, Petr [1 ,2 ]
Cecka, Filip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hradec Kralove, Dept Surg, Sokolska 581, Hradec Kralove 50002, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Def, Fac Mil Hlth Sci, Dept Mil Surg, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
Major abdominal surgery; Liver resection; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Estimated blood loss; Spectrophotometric measurement; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02288-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBlood loss during major abdominal surgery is an essential parameter in the evaluation of strategies aimed at reducing perioperative bleeding. However, blood loss quantification remains unreliable and inaccurate. The aim of this study was to compare several methods of blood loss quantification-visual estimation by surgeon and anesthesiologist, the gravimetric method, the calculation method with spectrophotometric measurement. The spectrophotometric measurement is considered as the most accurate method.MethodsThe study was designed as a prospective observational cohort single-center study. We analyzed 61 patients who underwent elective liver or pancreatic resection. The anesthesiologists' and surgeons' estimate of blood loss was based on a visual assessment. The gravimetric method was based on weighing the suction canister and surgical drapes before and after use. The basis of calculation method was anthropometric and hematological parameters, we used Lopez-Picado's formula. The spectrophotometric method was based on the spectrophotometric determination of hemoglobin mass in the lost blood. We compared the methods using paired t-test, non-parametric Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsVisual estimation by surgeons and anesthesiologists, gravimetric measurement, and calculation method were significantly different from spectrophotometric measurement at the significance level alpha = 0.05. All methods overestimated blood loss which was measured by spectrophotometric method. The estimate by surgeons was the closest to the spectrophotometric measurement, difference 68.7 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: -129.3--8.2).ConclusionsWe conclude that the estimate of blood loss by surgeons and anesthesiologists, as well as gravimetric method and calculation method are all significantly inaccurate in real surgical setting. We did not confirm the commonly accepted assumption that surgeons underestimate the blood loss.Trial registrationThe study was registered under the title " Blood Loss Quantification During Major Abdominal Surgery" at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05316649. Date of the first registration was 20/3/2022.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blood loss quantification during major abdominal surgery: prospective observational cohort study
    Ján Zajak
    Jiří Páral
    Miroslav Sirový
    Šárka Odložilová
    Kateřina Vinklerová
    Petr Lochman
    Filip Čečka
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 24
  • [2] Quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective observational cohort study
    Oreskov, Jakob O.
    Burcharth, Jakob
    Nielsen, Andreas F.
    Ekeloef, Sarah
    Kleif, Jakob
    Gogenur, Ismail
    [J]. MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2020, 75 (02) : 104 - 110
  • [3] Prospective observational study of postoperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery
    Duncan, Fiona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (13-14) : 1870 - 1879
  • [4] Changes in blood lactate levels after major elective abdominal surgery and the association with outcomes: a prospective observational study
    Li, Shenghua
    Peng, Kaiqin
    Liu, Fen
    Yu, Yang
    Xu, Tao
    Zhang, Yingtian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 184 (02) : 1059 - 1069
  • [5] Blood Loss during Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study
    Carr, Ighsaan M.
    Koegelenberg, Coenraad F. N.
    von Groote-Bidlingmaier, Florian
    Mowlana, Abdurasiet
    Silos, Kim
    Haverman, Thijs
    Diacon, Andreas H.
    Bolliger, Chris T.
    [J]. RESPIRATION, 2012, 84 (04) : 312 - 318
  • [6] The Relation Between Mean Arterial Pressure and Cardiac Index in Major Abdominal Surgery Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
    Kouz, Karim
    Bergholz, Alina
    Timmermann, Lea M.
    Brockmann, Lennart
    Flick, Moritz
    Hoppe, Phillip
    Briesenick, Luisa
    Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie
    Krause, Linda
    Maheshwari, Kamal
    Sessler, Daniel, I
    Saugel, Bernd
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 (02): : 322 - 329
  • [7] Endotypes of intraoperative hypotension during major abdominal surgery: a retrospective machine learning analysis of an observational cohort study
    Kouz, Karim
    Brockmann, Lennart
    Timmermann, Lea Malin
    Bergholz, Alina
    Flick, Moritz
    Maheshwari, Kamal
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Krause, Linda
    Saugel, Bernd
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 130 (03) : 253 - 261
  • [8] Postoperative Pain after Major Abdominal Surgery: Is It Gender Related? An Observational Prospective Study
    Theodoraki, Kassiani
    Staikou, Chryssoula
    Fassoulaki, Argyro
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2014, 14 (07) : 613 - 619
  • [9] Actual postoperative protein and calorie intake in patients undergoing major open abdominal cancer surgery: A prospective, observational cohort study
    Constansia, Reickly D. N.
    Hentzen, Judith E. K. R.
    Hogenbirk, Rianne N. M.
    van der Plas, Willemijn Y.
    Campmans-Kuijpers, Marjo J. E.
    Buis, Carlijn I.
    Kruijff, Schelto
    Klaase, Joost M.
    [J]. NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 37 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [10] Preoperative fluid retention increases blood loss during major open abdominal surgery
    Robert G. Hahn
    Hans Bahlmann
    Lena Nilsson
    [J]. Perioperative Medicine, 6