Academic machine learning researchers' ethical perspectives on algorithm development for health care: a qualitative study

被引:6
|
作者
Kasun, Max [1 ]
Ryan, Katie [1 ]
Paik, Jodi [1 ]
Lane-McKinley, Kyle [1 ]
Dunn, Laura Bodin [2 ]
Roberts, Laura Weiss [1 ]
Kim, Jane Paik [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Psychiat, Little Rock, AK 72205 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1070 Arastradero Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
machine learning; artificial intelligence; ethics; biomedical innovation; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocad238
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objectives We set out to describe academic machine learning (ML) researchers' ethical considerations regarding the development of ML tools intended for use in clinical care.Materials and Methods We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with a sample of ML researchers in medicine (N = 10) as part of a larger study investigating stakeholders' ethical considerations in the translation of ML tools in medicine. We used a qualitative descriptive design, applying conventional qualitative content analysis in order to allow participant perspectives to emerge directly from the data.Results Every participant viewed their algorithm development work as holding ethical significance. While participants shared positive attitudes toward continued ML innovation, they described concerns related to data sampling and labeling (eg, limitations to mitigating bias; ensuring the validity and integrity of data), and algorithm training and testing (eg, selecting quantitative targets; assessing reproducibility). Participants perceived a need to increase interdisciplinary training across stakeholders and to envision more coordinated and embedded approaches to addressing ethics issues.Discussion and Conclusion Participants described key areas where increased support for ethics may be needed; technical challenges affecting clinical acceptability; and standards related to scientific integrity, beneficence, and justice that may be higher in medicine compared to other industries engaged in ML innovation. Our results help shed light on the perspectives of ML researchers in medicine regarding the range of ethical issues they encounter or anticipate in their work, including areas where more attention may be needed to support the successful development and integration of medical ML tools.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 573
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Academic perspectives and experiences of knowledge translation: a qualitative study of public health researchers
    Collie, Alex
    Zardo, Pauline
    McKenzie, Donna Margaret
    Ellis, Niki
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2016, 12 (02): : 163 - 182
  • [2] The ethical oversight of learning health care activities in Switzerland: a qualitative study
    McLennan, Stuart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (08) : G81 - G86
  • [3] In Conversation With Researchers: Ethical Issues in Qualitative Interviews With Academic Elites
    Smith, Carmel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [4] Developer Perspectives on Potential Harms of Machine Learning Predictive Analytics in Health Care: Qualitative Analysis
    Nichol, Ariadne A.
    Sankar, Pamela L.
    Halley, Meghan C.
    Federico, Carole A.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [5] Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care - Addressing Ethical Challenges
    Char, Danton S.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    Magnus, David
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (11): : 981 - 983
  • [6] Ethical issues in consenting older adults: academic researchers and community perspectives
    Altawalbeh, S.
    Alkhateeb, F.
    Attarabeen, O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (01) : 291 - 291
  • [7] Ethical issues in consenting older adults: academic researchers and community perspectives
    Altawalbeh, Shoroq M.
    Alkhateeb, Fadi M.
    Attarabeeri, Omar F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [8] Expectations of Health Researchers From Academic Social Network Sites: Qualitative Study
    Dehghani, Mohammad
    Kahouei, Mehdi
    Akhondzadeh, Shahin
    Mesgarpour, Bita
    Ferdousi, Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (12)
  • [9] Clinician perspectives on machine learning prognostic algorithms in the routine care of patients with cancer: a qualitative study
    Parikh, Ravi B.
    Manz, Christopher R.
    Nelson, Maria N.
    Evans, Chalanda N.
    Regli, Susan H.
    O'Connor, Nina
    Schuchter, Lynn M.
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    Paladino, Joanna
    Shea, Judy A.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (05) : 4363 - 4372
  • [10] Clinician perspectives on machine learning prognostic algorithms in the routine care of patients with cancer: a qualitative study
    Ravi B. Parikh
    Christopher R. Manz
    Maria N. Nelson
    Chalanda N. Evans
    Susan H. Regli
    Nina O’Connor
    Lynn M. Schuchter
    Lawrence N. Shulman
    Mitesh S. Patel
    Joanna Paladino
    Judy A. Shea
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 4363 - 4372