Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach

被引:0
|
作者
Alnouss, Ahmed [1 ]
Alherbawi, Mohammad [1 ]
Parthasarathy, Prakash [1 ]
Al-Thani, Naela [1 ]
McKay, Gordon [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Tareq [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Div Sustainable Dev, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Liquefaction; Pyrolysis; Gasification; Biochar; Bio-oil; Optimisation; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; DECISION-MAKING; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ANIMAL MANURE; FOOD WASTE; DATE-PITS; BIO-OIL; PYROLYSIS; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Waste is the most abundant biomass worldwide for renewable energy and value-added products generation. While technologies for the treatment of multiple waste categories continue to evolve, frameworks that facilitate strategic decision-making within bio-economies are required. Therefore, the aim of this research is to develop a framework that can identify optimal processing route for converting different biomass wastes into valuable products. This study considers five different waste types available in Qatar, including date seed, camel manure, municipal solid waste (MSW), food waste, and sewage sludge. Whereas the investigated technologies include pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The three processes were simulated in Aspen Plus (R) and evaluated in terms of their technical, environmental, and economic performance for the different selected biomass feedstocks. A two-stage optimisation framework was then developed to identify the optimal processing technology for each biomass considering multiple products generation (i.e., syngas, biochar, and bio-oil). Investigating the waste to energy pathways, the presented model maximised net profit and energy generation while minimised the total associated emissions. The model indicated that gasification is the optimal processing technology to achieve higher economic return. While pyrolysis is recommended for the achievement of highest energy return. Nevertheless, HTL exhibited the best environmental performance with the lowest associated emissions. In addition, various wastes such as MSW and food waste are best processed by gasification to fulfil the environmental and economic criteria, while pyrolysis is more energy efficient in processing these wastes. Whereas HTL has been recommended only for high moisture containing biomass like manure and sludge, demonstrating relatively high energy efficiency, but lower economic return relative to gasification and pyrolysis. The presented optimisation framework may provide insights for decision-makers to optimally valorise waste considering national priorities.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current and emerging waste-to-energy technologies: A comparative study with multi-criteria decision analysis
    Patil, Shivaraj Chandrakant
    Schulze-Netzer, Corinna
    Korpås, Magnus
    [J]. Smart Energy, 2024, 16
  • [3] Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment
    Khan, Imran
    Kabir, Zobaidul
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 : 320 - 333
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision analysis of waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Sultanate of Oman
    Qazi, Wajeeha A.
    Abushammala, Mohammed F. M.
    Azam, Mohammed-Hasham
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2018, 36 (07) : 594 - 605
  • [5] A Multi-Criteria Approach to Decision Making in Broadband Technology Selection
    Marco Araújo
    Love Ekenberg
    Mats Danielson
    João Confraria
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2022, 31 : 387 - 418
  • [6] A Multi-Criteria Approach to Decision Making in Broadband Technology Selection
    Araujo, Marco
    Ekenberg, Love
    Danielson, Mats
    Confraria, Joao
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2022, 31 (02) : 387 - 418
  • [7] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Process to Select Waste-to-Energy Technology in Developing Countries: The Case of Ghana
    Agbejule, Adebayo
    Shamsuzzoha, Ahm
    Lotchi, Kodjovi
    Rutledge, Kendall
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [8] A multi-criteria approach for selection of wave energy converter/location
    Kamranzad, Bahareh
    Hadadpour, Sanaz
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 204
  • [9] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Energy Storage Technology Selection Based on Demand
    Qie, Xiaotong
    Zhang, Rui
    Hu, Yanyong
    Sun, Xialing
    Chen, Xue
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review
    Vlachokostas, Ch
    Michailidou, A., V
    Achillas, Ch
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 138 (138):