Freedom, AI and God: why being dominated by a friendly super-AI might not be so bad

被引：2

作者：

Luck, Morgan ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Social Work & Arts & Artificial Intelligence, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia

[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Cyber Futures Inst, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia

来源：

AI & SOCIETY | 2024年 / 40卷 / 2期

关键词：

AI; Friendly AI; Super-AI; Freedom; God; Domination; Pettit; Sparrow;

D O I：

10.1007/s00146-024-01863-w

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

One response to the existential threat posed by a super-intelligent AI is to design it to be friendly to us. Some have argued that even if this were possible, the resulting AI would treat us as we do our pets. Sparrow (AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01698-x, 2023) argues that this would be a bad outcome, for such an AI would dominate us-resulting in our freedom being diminished (Pettit in Just freedom: A moral compass for a complex world. WW Norton & Company, 2014). In this paper, I consider whether this would be such a bad outcome.

引用

页码：291 / 298

页数：8