Short communication: Estimation of ileal digestibility in chickens using single- and dual-tracer methods

Fractionation of digesta, as occurs during gastrointestinal transit in chickens, complicates accurate measurements of ileal digestibility using tracers. Dual-tracer methods using separate tracers for solid and fluid digesta phases may improve the accuracy of digestibility measurements when assumptions of the single tracer method are violated. The aim of the present study was to compare the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of nutrients calculated with single- and dual-tracer methods in chickens fed diets varying in particle size, anticipating digesta phase separation in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. A total of 112 Dekalb White (BW: 1.53 +/- 0.107 kg) and 112 Bovans Black (BW: 1.79 +/- 0.127 kg) 29-week-old laying hens were distributed over 32 pens (seven birds/pen). Within breed, pens were randomly assigned to one of two experimental diets (coarse vs fine oat hulls; n = 8 replicate pens per diet/breed combination). Diets were supplemented with TiO2 (3 g/kg) and Co-EDTA (2 g/kg). On days 34, 35, or 36, birds were euthanised and digesta from the ileum was collected for tracer and nutrient analyses. Apparent ileal digestibility was subsequently calculated by single- and dual-tracer methods. Although coarse oat hulls were hypothesised to increase the fractionation of solid and fluid digesta phases, no breed or diet x method interactions were found. Using a single tracer method based on TiO2, AID of nitrogen (N) was overestimated by 3%-units (P < 0.01) compared with the dual-tracer method, whereas AID estimates of DM, starch, fat, and non-starch polysaccharides did not differ (P > 0.09) and precision of all AID estimates was improved. In conclusion, these results show that although from a conceptual perspective, dual-tracer methods are presumed to better account for the variation in flow behaviour of different digesta phases, AID estimates obtained by the commonly used single tracer method using solid-phase tracer TiO2 were more precise and only marginally differed from estimates obtained by a dual-tracer method using distinct tracers for solid (TiO2) and liquid (Co-EDTA) digesta phases. Considering technical and economical constraints, the single tracer method may thus be the method of choice in many situations. Only when digestibility of proteins or amino acids is of specific interest, single tracer methods using a solid-phase tracer may not suffice. Nevertheless, for both single- and dual-tracer methods, tracer selection is critical, and the choice of tracers should depend on the nutrient(s) of interest.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).