Live Birth Outcomes for PCOS Patients Under the Follicular-Phase Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Protocol or Antagonist Protocol - A Retrospective Chinese Cohort

被引:0
|
作者
Zhai, Jiajia [1 ]
Zhang, Junyan [2 ,3 ]
He, Jingfang [3 ]
Lv, Minzhi [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Bozheng [6 ]
Li, Guanqun [7 ]
Du, Yuanjie [1 ]
Hao, Guimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Reprod Med, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Evidence Based Med, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[3] Bothwin Clin Study Consultant, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Biostat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Washington, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98053 USA
[7] Technoderma Med Inc, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
PCOS; depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol; gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol; cumulative live birth rate; live birth rate; POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME; HYPERSTIMULATION; INFERTILITY;
D O I
10.2147/JMDH.S432936
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: For patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET), there has been no consensus regarding which protocol is the most optimal for live birth rate in fresh cycles. We sought to evaluate depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF outcomes for PCOS patients in a single fertility center. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, PCOS patients who visited the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University reproductive center between February 2012 and December 2019 were screened, and 533 PCOS infertility patients were included undergoing their first IVF cycle, with 470 in the depot GnRH agonist group and 63 in the GnRH antagonist group. The primary of this study outcome was the fresh live birth rate (LBR). Results: PCOS women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR (49.79%) than those in the GnRH antagonist group (34.92%, p = 0.027). The multivariable logistic regression also confirmed that women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR than those in the GnRH antagonist group (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.05 similar to 3.18, p = 0.032). After propensity score matching (PSM), the LBR in the depot GnRH agonist group was higher (50.32%) than that of the GnRH antagonist group (35.48%), p = 0.033. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were similar between the two groups, with 35 in the depot GnRH group and 6 in the GnRH antagonist group (p = 0.561). Conclusions: For PCOS patients in fresh embryo transfer cycles, the depot GnRH agonist protocol may lead to a higher LBR than the antagonist protocol with satisfied lower OHSS rates.
引用
收藏
页码:2781 / 2792
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] An Individualized Recommendation for Controlled Ovary Stimulation Protocol in Women Who Received the GnRH Agonist Long-Acting Protocol or the GnRH Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chen, Ming-Xing
    Meng, Xiang-Qian
    Zhong, Zhao-Hui
    Tang, Xiao-Jun
    Li, Tian
    Feng, Qian
    Adu-Gyamfi, Enoch Appiah
    Jia, Yan
    Lv, Xing-Yu
    Geng, Li-Hong
    Zhu, Lin
    He, Wei
    Wan, Qi
    Ding, Yu-Bin
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] FOLLICULAR-PHASE SINGLE-DOSE GNRH AGONIST PROTOCOL VS GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS WITH REPEATED IVF FAILURE.
    Huang, Rui
    Yang, Xing
    Li, Qian
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E526 - E527
  • [3] Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rui Yang
    Yichun Guan
    Valerie Perrot
    Juan Ma
    Rong Li
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 2027 - 2037
  • [4] Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yang, Rui
    Guan, Yichun
    Perrot, Valerie
    Ma, Juan
    Li, Rong
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (05) : 2027 - 2037
  • [5] GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH Agonist Long Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Clinical Outcomes and Maternal-Neonatal Safety
    Zhu, Jieru
    Xing, Weijie
    Li, Tao
    Lin, Hui
    Ou, Jianping
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] Comparison of GnRH antagonist with long GnRH agonist protocol after OCP pretreatment in PCOs patients
    Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad
    Roya Nasiri
    Batool Rashidi
    Fedieh Haghollahi
    Marzieh Ataie
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2010, 282 : 319 - 325
  • [7] Comparison of GnRH antagonist with long GnRH agonist protocol after OCP pretreatment in PCOs patients
    Tehraninejad, Ensieh Shahrokh
    Nasiri, Roya
    Rashidi, Batool
    Haghollahi, Fedieh
    Ataie, Marzieh
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2010, 282 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [8] Safety profiles of offspring born from early-follicular long-acting GnRH agonist protocol and daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a retrospective study
    Du, Linqing
    Song, Jianyuan
    Fan, Wenqian
    Ye, Tian
    Kong, Huijuan
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [9] Analysis and prediction of risk factors of ovarian hyperstimulation caused by Long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in follicular phase
    Ni, Y-H
    Zhang, H-L
    Jiang, W-W
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (09) : 3261 - 3268
  • [10] GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation
    Geng, Yudi
    Xun, Yang
    Hu, Shiqiao
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Jin, Lei
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 309 - 313