Adverse drug reaction signal detection methods in spontaneous reporting system: A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Jiao, Xue-Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pu, Libin [5 ]
Lan, Shan [6 ]
Li, Hailong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zeng, Linan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Huiqing [7 ,9 ]
Zhang, Lingli [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Med Prod Adm NMPA Key Lab Tech Res Drug Prod, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Pharm, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Ctr Food & Drug Evaluat Inspect & Monitori, SCFDA Adverse Drug React Monitoring Ctr Med Device, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[7] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Med Simulat Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[8] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[9] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Renmin Nan Rd 20, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
adverse drug reaction; drug safety scenario; optimization selection; signal detection method; spontaneous reporting system; TIME-TO-ONSET; DATA-MINING ALGORITHMS; FALSE DISCOVERY RATES; DISPROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS; PHARMACOVIGILANCE; PERFORMANCE; DATABASES;
D O I
10.1002/pds.5768
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundA series of signal detection methods have been developed to detect adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals in spontaneous reporting system. However, different signal detection methods yield quite different signal detection results, and we do not know which method has the best detection performance. How to choose the most suitable signal detection method is an urgent problem to be solved. In this study, we systematically reviewed the characteristics and application scopes of current signal detection methods, with the goal of providing references for the optimization selection of signal detection methods in spontaneous reporting system.MethodsWe searched six databases from inception to January 2023. The search strategy targeted literatures regarding signal detection methods in spontaneous reporting system. We used thematic analysis approach to summarize the advantages, disadvantages, and application scope of each signal detection method.ResultsA total of 93 literatures were included, including 27 reviews and 66 methodological studies. Moreover, 31 signal detection methods were identified in these literatures. Each signal detection method has its inherent advantages and disadvantages, resulting in different application scopes of these methods.ConclusionOur systematic review finds that there are variabilities in the advantages, disadvantages, and application scopes of different signal detection methods. This finding indicates that the most suitable signal detection method varies across different drug safety scenarios. Moreover, when selecting signal detection method in a particular drug safety scenario, the following factors need to be considered: purpose of research, database size, drug characteristics, adverse event characteristics, and characteristics of the relations between drugs and adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Methods for Signal Detection on Adverse Drug Reaction Spontaneous Reporting Database of the Thai FDA
    Bunchuailua, W.
    Zuckerman, I. H.
    Kulsomboon, V.
    Suwankesawong, W.
    Singhasivanon, P.
    Kaewkungwal, J.
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 32 (10) : 950 - 951
  • [2] Patient versus Healthcare Professional Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting A Systematic Review
    Inch, Jackie
    Watson, Margaret C.
    Anakwe-Umeh, Stella
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 35 (10) : 807 - 818
  • [3] Application of Quantitative Signal Detection in the Dutch Spontaneous Reporting System for Adverse Drug Reactions
    Eugène P. van Puijenbroek
    Willem L. Diemont
    Kees van Grootheest
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2003, 26 : 293 - 301
  • [4] Application of quantitative signal detection in the Dutch spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions
    van Puijenbroek, EP
    Diemont, WL
    van Grootheest, K
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 26 (05) : 293 - 301
  • [5] Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Ethiopia: Systematic Review
    Hailu, Abel Demerew
    Mohammed, Solomon Ahmed
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [6] Signal Detection of Adverse Drug Reaction of Amoxicillin Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database
    Soukavong, Mick
    Kim, Jungmee
    Park, Kyounghoon
    Yang, Bo Ram
    Lee, Joongyub
    Jin, Xue-Mei
    Park, Byung-Joo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (09) : 1355 - 1361
  • [7] Determinants of signal selection in a spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions
    van Puijenbroek, EP
    van Grootheest, K
    Diemont, WL
    Leufkens, HGM
    Egberts, ACG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 52 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [8] Adverse drug reaction or innocent bystander? A systematic comparison of statistical discovery methods for spontaneous reporting systems
    Dijkstra, Louis
    Garling, Marco
    Foraita, Ronja
    Pigeot, Iris
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (04) : 396 - 403
  • [9] A signal for an abuse liability for pregabalin—results from the Swedish spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting system
    Sofie Schwan
    Anders Sundström
    Elisabet Stjernberg
    Ebba Hallberg
    Pär Hallberg
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2010, 66 : 947 - 953
  • [10] A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection on adverse drug reaction spontaneous reporting database of Guangdong province in China
    Li, Chanjuan
    Xia, Jielai
    Deng, Jianxiong
    Jiang, Jing
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 (06) : 593 - 600