A conceptual framework of barriers to data science implementation: a practitioners' guideline

被引:0
|
作者
Reddy, Rajesh Chidananda [1 ]
Mishra, Debasisha [2 ]
Goyal, D. P. [3 ]
Rana, Nripendra P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Shillong, Shillong, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Shillong, Dept Strateg Management, Shillong, India
[3] Indian Inst Management Shillong, Dept Informat Syst & Analyt, Shillong, India
[4] Qatar Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Management & Mkt, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Data science; Barriers; Hierarchical model; ISM; Fuzzy MICMAC; Categorization; BIG DATA ANALYTICS; DATA CHALLENGES; ADOPTION; OPPORTUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; LOGISTICS;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-03-2023-0160
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe study explores the potential barriers to data science (DS) implementation in organizations and identifies the key barriers. The identified barriers were explored for their interconnectedness and characteristics. This study aims to help organizations formulate apt DS strategies by providing a close-to-reality DS implementation framework of barriers, in conjunction with extant literature and practitioners' viewpoints.Design/methodology/approachThe authors synthesized 100 distinct barriers through systematic literature review (SLR) under the individual, organizational and governmental taxonomies. In discussions with 48 industry experts through semi-structured interviews, 14 key barriers were identified. The selected barriers were explored for their pair-wise relationships using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and fuzzy Matriced' Impacts Croise's Multiplication Appliquee a UN Classement (MICMAC) analyses in formulating the hierarchical framework.FindingsThe lack of awareness and data-related challenges are identified as the most prominent barriers, followed by non-alignment with organizational strategy, lack of competency with vendors and premature governmental arrangements, and classified as independent variables. The non-commitment of top-management team (TMT), significant investment costs, lack of swiftness in change management and a low tolerance for complexity and initial failures are recognized as the linkage variables. Employee reluctance, mid-level managerial resistance, a dearth of adequate skills and knowledge and working in silos depend on the rest of the identified barriers. The perceived threat to society is classified as the autonomous variable.Originality/valueThe study augments theoretical understanding from the literature with the practical viewpoints of industry experts in enhancing the knowledge of the DS ecosystem. The research offers organizations a generic framework to combat hindrances to DS initiatives strategically.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Conceptual Framework for Mobility Data Science
    Stocker, Alexander
    Kaiser, Christian
    Lechner, Gernot
    Fellmann, Michael
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 117126 - 117142
  • [2] Barriers to Guideline Implementation
    Behrens, Thomas
    Keil, Ulrich
    Heidrich, Jan
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (28-29): : 491 - 491
  • [3] A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers
    Ali, Samnan
    Uppal, M. Amaad
    Gulliver, Stephen R.
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2018, 31 (01) : 156 - 180
  • [4] A conceptual framework for a systemic understanding of barriers during lean implementation
    Puram, Praveen
    Sony, Michael
    Antony, Jiju
    Gurumurthy, Anand
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2022, 34 (06): : 1469 - 1484
  • [5] A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for enablers and barriers of an enterprise data science strategy
    Rajesh Chidananda Reddy
    Biplab Bhattacharjee
    Debasisha Mishra
    Anandadeep Mandal
    [J]. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2022, 20 : 223 - 255
  • [6] A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for enablers and barriers of an enterprise data science strategy
    Reddy, Rajesh Chidananda
    Bhattacharjee, Biplab
    Mishra, Debasisha
    Mandal, Anandadeep
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 20 (01) : 223 - 255
  • [7] Designing for facilitator resilience in implementation science: A conceptual framework
    Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya
    Ganz, David
    Barnard, Jenny
    Penney, Lauren
    Finley, Erin
    Hamilton, Alison
    Chawla, Neetu
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [8] One Health and the Environment: From Conceptual Framework to Implementation Science
    Ogunseitan, Oladele A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 64 (02): : 11 - 21
  • [9] IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE AS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Bertrand, William E.
    Hammler, Katharina
    [J]. EDULEARN13: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, : 5990 - 5999
  • [10] Barriers to effective implementation of guideline recommendations
    Erhardt, LR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 : 36S - 41S