A comparison of 87Rb/87Sr and 40Ar/39Ar dates: Evaluating the problem of excess 40Ar in Himalayan mica

被引:12
|
作者
Larson, Kyle P. [1 ]
Button, Mark [2 ]
Shrestha, Sudip [2 ]
Camacho, Alfredo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Earth Environm & Geog Sci, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fipke Lab Trace Element Res, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Earth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Himalaya; in situ Rb-Sr geochronology; Ar; Ar geochronology; tectonics; geochronology; MAIN CENTRAL THRUST; RB-SR; CLOSURE TEMPERATURE; AGE CONSTRAINTS; ARGON; EVOLUTION; AR; VISUALIZATION; GEOCHRONOLOGY; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118058
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The problem of excess 40Ar (ArE) affecting 40Ar/39Ar dates, particularly in biotite, is a long-standing issue in Himalayan geology. The development of in situ Rb-Sr dating presents a convenient alternative method to extract geochronological data from the same material and avoids potential ArE complications. Herein we present a comparison between previously published 40Ar/39Ar data, including many interpreted to reflect ArE , and new in situ Rb-Sr analyses for the same specimens. This work demonstrates that Rb-Sr mica dates from across the exhumed Himalayan metamorphic core typically overlap 40Ar/39Ar dates from the same rocks that are unaffected by ArE. Where 40Ar/39Ar dates have been interpreted to reflect ArE , the Rb-Sr method invariably yields dates that are younger than the ArE date and consistent with other mineral chronometer systems. Finally, while further refinement is required, we propose a technique to extract spot ages for high Rb/low Sr biotite analyses, by correcting for common 87Sr based on the present known ratio of 87Sr/88Sr, removing the need to assume an initial 87Sr/86Sr. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of white mica in situ 87Rb/87Sr with in situ and step-heat 40Ar/39Ar dates in orogenic settings
    Kellett, Dawn A.
    Larson, Kyle P.
    Skipton, Diane R.
    [J]. LITHOS, 2024, 482
  • [2] 40AR/39AR DATES FOR SPREADING RATES IN EASTERN ICELAND
    ROSS, JG
    MUSSETT, AE
    [J]. NATURE, 1976, 259 (5538) : 36 - 38
  • [3] 40AR/39AR DATING OF PYRITE
    YORK, D
    MASLIWEC, A
    KUYBIDA, P
    HANES, JA
    HALL, CM
    KENYON, WJ
    SPOONER, ETC
    SCOTT, SD
    [J]. NATURE, 1982, 300 (5887) : 52 - 53
  • [4] 40Ar/39Ar dating of chlorite
    Alexandre, P
    Kyser, TK
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (11) : A539 - A539
  • [5] Considerations in dating impact craters using the 40Ar/39Ar method: The problem of inherited 40Ar*
    Jourdan, F.
    Renne, P. R.
    Reimold, W. U.
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 71 (15) : A452 - A452
  • [6] Occurrence of Excess 40Ar in Amphibole: Implications of 40Ar/39Ar Dating by Laser Stepwise Heating and in vacuo Crushing
    Rong-Guo Hu
    Xiu-Juan Bai
    Jan Wijbrans
    Fraukje Brouwer
    Yi-Lai Zhao
    Hua-Ning Qiu
    [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2018, 29 : 416 - 426
  • [7] Evaluating intercomparability amongst several 40Ar/39Ar laboratories
    Heizler, MT
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 69 (10) : A318 - A318
  • [8] Occurrence of Excess 40Ar in Amphibole: Implications of 40Ar/39Ar Dating by Laser Stepwise Heating and in vacuo Crushing
    Rong-Guo Hu
    Xiu-Juan Bai
    Jan Wijbrans
    Fraukje Brouwer
    Yi-Lai Zhao
    Hua-Ning Qiu
    [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2018, 29 (02) : 416 - 426
  • [9] Intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar dating standards
    Baksi, AK
    Archibald, DA
    Farrar, E
    [J]. CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 1996, 129 (3-4) : 307 - 324
  • [10] 40AR/39AR DATING OF LUNAR SAMPLES
    DAVIS, PK
    LEWIS, RS
    ALEXANDE.EC
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1971, 52 (11): : 857 - +