Building Back Better: Going Big with Emancipatory Sciences

被引:0
|
作者
Estes, Carroll L. [1 ]
DiCarlo, Nicholas B. [1 ]
Yeh, Jarmin C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth & Aging, Dept Social & Behav Sci, 490 Illinois St, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
关键词
Capitalism; democracy; emancipatory gerontology; emancipatory sciences; neoliberalism; patriarchy; The state; KNOWLEDGE; COVID-19; ADULTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/08959420.2023.2182998
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
This commentary argues that precarity and inequity across the life course and aging has accelerated via the COVID-19 pandemic. President Biden's vaccination efforts, $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act, and Build Back Better framework reflect a paradigm shift to restore faith and trust in government that boldly confronts entrenched austerity ideologues. We offer emancipatory sciences as a conceptual framework to analyze and promote social structural change and epic theory development. Emancipatory sciences aim to advance knowledge and the realization of dignity, access, equity, respect, healing, social justice, and social change through individual and collective agency and social institutions. Epic theory development moves beyond isolated incidents as single events and, instead, grasps and advances theory through attempts to change the world itself by demanding attention to inequality, power, and action. Gerontology with an emancipatory science lens offers a framework and vocabulary to understand the individual and collective consequences of the institutional and policy forces that shape aging and generations within and across the life course. It locates an ethical and moral philosophy engaged in the Biden Administration's approach, which proposes redistributing - from bottom-up - material and symbolic resources via family, public, community, and environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 475
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Building back better: How big are green spending multipliers?
    Batini, Nicoletta
    Di Serio, Mario
    Fragetta, Matteo
    Melina, Giovanni
    Waldron, Anthony
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 193
  • [2] Building Back Better
    Mysak, Tania
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2021, 74 (03): : 302 - 302
  • [3] Building back better
    Oakley, Tim
    [J]. Oakley, Tim, 1600, Chartered Association of Building Engineers (96): : 28 - 29
  • [4] Building back better?
    Michie, Jonathan
    Sheehan, Maura
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 35 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [5] Building a Group Practice and Going Big
    Pariser, David M.
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2023, 41 (04) : 635 - 641
  • [6] On Building Better Mousetraps and Understanding the Human Condition: Reflections on Big Data in the Social Sciences
    Lin, Jimmy
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 659 (01): : 33 - 47
  • [7] Building back better together
    Edge, Clare
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2021, 34 : 90 - 91
  • [8] Governance for Building Back Better
    Mohmand, Shandana Khan
    Anderson, Colin
    Gallien, Max
    Harrison, Tom
    Joshi, Anuradha
    Loureiro, Miguel
    Mascagni, Giulia
    Occhiali, Giovanni
    van den Boogaard, Vanessa
    [J]. IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 52 (01): : 163 - 179
  • [9] Building the market back better
    [J]. Highways, 2021, 90 (06): : 35 - 36
  • [10] NGST aims for big advance by going back in time
    不详
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5559) : 1449 - 1449