Genetics of tibia bone properties of crossbred commercial laying hens in different housing systems

被引:3
|
作者
Johnsson, Martin [1 ]
Wall, Helena [2 ]
Lopes Pinto, Fernando A. [1 ]
Fleming, Robert H. [3 ]
McCormack, Heather A. [3 ]
Benavides-Reyes, Cristina [4 ]
Dominguez-Gasca, Nazaret [4 ]
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Estefania [4 ]
Dunn, Ian C. [3 ]
Rodriguez-Navarro, Alejandro B. [4 ]
Kindmark, Andreas [5 ]
de Koning, Dirk-Jan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, S-75651 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Management, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Roslin Inst, Edinburgh EH25 259, Scotland
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Mineralogia &Petrol, Granada 18002, Spain
[5] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Akadem sjukhuset, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, Box 7023, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
bone; quantitative genetics; gene-by-environment; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; BREAKING STRENGTH; FURNISHED CAGES; BODY-WEIGHT; GROWTH; OSTEOPOROSIS; INTERCROSS; EXERCISE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/g3journal/jkac302
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis and bone fractures are a severe problem for the welfare of laying hens, with genetics and environment, such as housing system, each making substantial contributions to bone strength. In this work, we performed genetic analyses of bone strength, bone mineral density, and bone composition, as well as body weight, in 860 commercial crossbred laying hens from 2 different companies, kept in either furnished cages or floor pens. We compared bone traits between housing systems and crossbreds and performed a genome-wide association study of bone properties and body weight. As expected, the 2 housing systems produced a large difference in bone strength, with layers housed in floor pens having stronger bones. These differences were accompanied by differences in bone geometry, mineralization, and chemical composition. Genome scans either combining or independently analyzing the 2 housing systems revealed no genome-wide significant loci for bone breaking strength. We detected 3 loci for body weight that were shared between the housing systems on chromosomes 4, 6, and 27 (either genome-wide significant or suggestive) and these coincide with associations for bone length. In summary, we found substantial differences in bone strength, content, and composition between hens kept in floor pens and furnished cages that could be attributed to greater physical activity in pen housing. We found little evidence for large-effect loci for bone strength in commercial crossbred hens, consistent with a highly polygenic architecture for bone strength in the production environment. The lack of consistent genetic associations between housing systems in combination with the differences in bone phenotypes could be due to gene-by-environment interactions with housing system or a lack of power to detect shared associations for bone strength.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of age and housing systems on properties of tibia and humerus of Lohmann White hens1: Bone properties of laying hens in commercial housing systems
    Regmi, P.
    Nelson, N.
    Haut, R. C.
    Orth, M. W.
    Karcher, D. M.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2017, 96 (10) : 3755 - 3762
  • [2] Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens
    Sharma, Milan K.
    White, Dima
    Chen, Chongxiao
    Kim, Woo K.
    Adhikari, Pratima
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (03)
  • [3] Influence of different housing systems on prevalence of keel bone lesions in laying hens
    Saraiva, Sonia
    Esteves, Alexandra
    Stilwell, George
    [J]. AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 48 (05) : 454 - 459
  • [4] LIMB BONE STRENGTH AND MOVEMENT IN LAYING HENS FROM DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS
    KNOWLES, TG
    BROOM, DM
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1990, 126 (15) : 354 - 356
  • [5] Salmonella incidence in broiler and laying hens with the different housing systems
    Pieskus, Juozas
    Kazeniauskas, Edvardas
    Butrimaite-Ambrozeviciene, Ceslova
    Stanevicius, Zenonas
    Mauricas, Mykolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2008, 45 (03): : 227 - 231
  • [6] Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems
    Jansson, Desiree S.
    Nyman, Ann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Christensson, Dan
    Goransson, Magnus
    Fossum, Oddvar
    Hoglund, Johan
    [J]. AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 39 (06) : 525 - 532
  • [7] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND WELFARE OF LAYING HENS
    Sosnowka-Czajka, Ewa
    Herbut, Eugeniusz
    Skomorucha, Iwona
    [J]. ANNALS OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 10 (04): : 349 - 360
  • [8] Housing systems and welfare in laying hens
    Michel, V.
    Arnould, C.
    Mirabito, L.
    Guemene, D.
    [J]. PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2007, 20 (01): : 47 - 51
  • [9] Effects of housing systems on behaviour and welfare of autochthonous laying hens and a commercial hybrid
    Fiorilla, Edoardo
    Ozella, Laura
    Sirri, Federico
    Zampiga, Marco
    Piscitelli, Raffaela
    Tarantola, Martina
    Ponzio, Patrizia
    Mugnai, Cecilia
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2024, 274
  • [10] Evaluation of physiological functions and performance in laying hens in different housing systems
    Shoji, Gaku
    Tochinai, Ryota
    Sekizawa, Shin-ichi
    Kuwahara, Masayoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 717 - 718