The dark side of auditor pay disparity: Evidence from audit adjustments

被引:0
|
作者
Tong, Lijing [1 ]
Xie, Lu [2 ]
Zhang, Min [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Business, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pay disparity; Pay dispersion; Audit quality; Audit adjustment; Compensation; Equity theory; RANK-ORDER TOURNAMENTS; QUALITY EVIDENCE; INDIVIDUAL AUDITORS; TOP MANAGEMENT; EXECUTIVE PAY; FIRM; INCENTIVES; EXPERIENCE; PERFORMANCE; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107133
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the relation between auditor pay disparity and audit adjustments, and finds that offices with higher pay disparity are associated with lower magnitudes of audit adjustments. Further analysis suggests that the negative influence on audit adjustment is primarily driven by abnormal pay disparity. These results align with Equity Theory, which posits that pay disparity leads to employees experiencing feelings of resentment and shirking their duties, consequently further harming auditors' work performance. In additional tests, we find that the association between pay disparity and audit adjustments is more pronounced when auditors bear greater economic pressure in life or when auditors contribute a higher per capita revenue to the office. Moreover, we find that audit offices could relieve the negative effects of pay disparity by providing low-level auditors with higher salary and more opportunities for accumulating human capital. Overall, our study provides important evidence on the role of pay disparity regarding audit outcomes and enriches the literature on auditor compensation.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clients' strategic change and auditor behavior: Evidence from audit adjustments and audit fees
    Wu, Bin
    Li, Anqi
    Zhang, Wen
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ACCOUNTING, 2024, 64
  • [2] Audit quality and audit size: Evidence from auditor mergers in China
    Zhan, Jun
    Her, Young-Won
    Chen, Keji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 31 (03): : 170 - 184
  • [3] Key audit matter and auditor liability: evidence from auditor evaluators in Thailand
    Pratoomsuwan, Thanyawee
    Yolrabil, Orapan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 21 (04) : 741 - 762
  • [4] Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan
    Skinner, Douglas J.
    Srinivasan, Suraj
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (05): : 1737 - 1765
  • [5] Audit committee-auditor interlocking and audit fees: evidence from China
    Xiang, Rui
    Lin, Rongyu
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023,
  • [6] Voluntary audit committees, auditor selection and audit quality: evidence from Taiwan
    Kao, Mao-Feng
    Shiue, Min-Jeng
    Tseng, Chien-Hao
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (04) : 616 - 642
  • [7] Local Gambling Attitudes and Audit Quality: Evidence from Audit Adjustments
    Tong, Lijing
    Wu, Bin
    Zhang, Min
    [J]. ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 59 (01): : 381 - 410
  • [8] Audit fees and audit adjustments: evidence from Welsh local authorities
    Baylis, Richard M.
    Greenwood, Margaret J.
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (05) : 357 - 364
  • [9] Time to Revisit Audit Committee Activity: Evidence from Audit Adjustments
    Park, Sohee
    Cho, Meeok
    Kim, Bum-Joon
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (10) : 2330 - 2341
  • [10] The Role of Key Audit Matters in Assessing Auditor Liability: Evidence from Auditor and Non-auditor Evaluators
    Pratoomsuwan, Thanyawee
    Yolrabil, Orapan
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING, 2020, 13 (01): : 35 - 64