Design and Certification for Facade Access Systems: An Alternative Risk-Based Method

被引:1
|
作者
Desch, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 3201 S Dearborn St,AM 228, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
LOAD;
D O I
10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1248
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two new design and certification methodologies have been developed to compute the reliability of facade access systems using simplified risk-based procedures. These methods consider uncertainties in the loads, load effects, and component capacities to calculate individual component probabilities of failure. These probabilities are then used to compute an overall system probability of failure, which can be used for both design decision making and system certification purposes. A worked example is presented to fully demonstrate the certification procedure. In this paper, reliable procedures to certify and design facade access systems are both presented and demonstrated. These methods determine the risk of failure for each element of a facade access system and then use these to determine the risk of system failure. This risk of failure can then be compared against the desired maximum risk for failure of the system. These approaches are useful for efficiently computing the approximate reliability of a facade access system, which can then be used to inform design, certification, planning, and/or operation decision making. These are intended to be practical approaches to determine the reliability of a facade access system. As such, the necessary steps and equations for these methods are discussed, and a fully worked example is presented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-based Decision Method for Access Control Systems
    Shaikh, Riaz Ahmed
    Adi, Kamel
    Logrippo, Luigi
    Mankovski, Serge
    [J]. 2011 NINTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIVACY, SECURITY AND TRUST, 2011, : 189 - 192
  • [2] Risk-based regulation and certification of autonomous transport systems
    Johnsen, S. O.
    Hoem, A.
    Stalhane, T.
    Jenssen, G.
    Moen, T.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1791 - 1799
  • [3] Simulation as an alternative to codified risk-based engineering design
    Marek, P
    Haldar, A
    [J]. ISUMA 2003: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND ANALYSIS, 2003, : 222 - 227
  • [4] Risk-based Design of Computer Systems Validation
    Roemer, Markus
    [J]. PHARMAZEUTISCHE INDUSTRIE, 2013, 75 (05): : 818 - 820
  • [5] Risk-Based Design of Dike Elevation Employing Alternative Enumeration
    Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman
    Hoes, Olivier
    Ashraf, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (08)
  • [6] Dynamic risk-based decision methods for access control systems
    Shaikh, Riaz Ahmed
    Adi, Kamel
    Logrippo, Luigi
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2012, 31 (04) : 447 - 464
  • [7] A Unified Risk-Based Approach to the Development and Certification Process of Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Sabirov, M.I.
    Lazareva, P.A.
    [J]. Russian Aeronautics, 2024, 67 (02): : 221 - 229
  • [8] OPTIMAL RISK-BASED DESIGN OF FLOOD LEVEE SYSTEMS
    TUNG, YK
    MAYS, LW
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (04) : 843 - 852
  • [9] Flood defense systems design by risk-based approaches
    Tung, YK
    [J]. WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 30 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [10] Respiratory infection risk-based ventilation design method
    Kurnitski, Jarek
    Kiil, Martin
    Wargocki, Pawel
    Boerstra, Atze
    Seppanen, Olli
    Olesen, Bjarne
    Morawska, Lidia
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 206