Agriculture and biodiversity damage: A prospective evaluation of the impact of Brazilian agriculture on its ecoregions through life cycle assessment methodology

被引:5
|
作者
Lucas, Kassio R. G. [1 ]
Caldarelli, Carlos Eduardo [2 ]
Ventura, Mauricio Ursi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Estadual Londrina, Ctr Appl Social Studies, Dept Econ, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid,PR 445 Km 380,Campus Univ, BR-86057970 Londrina, PR, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Londrina, Ctr Agr Sci, Dept Agron, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid,PR 445 Km 380, Campus Uni, BR-86057970 Londrina, PR, Brazil
关键词
Native species; Preservation; Deforestation; Ecosystem; Agricultural production; TROPICAL DEFORESTATION; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; RICE; AREA; DUCK; COMBINATION; AMERICA; DRIVERS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165762
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The natural ecosystems' replacement by farmland and the consequent biodiversity damage (BD) for agriculture are one of the principal concerns worldwide. The development of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology involves enormous efforts to include BD parameters and develop a prospective LCA approach for future evalu-ations of production and technologies use. Thus, this work aims to determine the current impacts and estimate the future impacts in terms of damage to biodiversity caused by land occupation by agricultural commodities produced in Brazil, such as coffee, corn, oranges, and sugar cane, for the six ecoregions present in the coun-try-Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado, Pampas, and Pantanal-in the 20-year period from 2015 to 2035. For this and to search for hotpots, we applied the indicators proposed by Chaudhary and Books (2018), for inventories whose functional unit is production per m2 of 1 kg of crop. Although the Cerrado is one of the ecoregions in which deforestation has advanced the most, it has the area/production ratio that has evolved the most. In contrast, Pampas and Caatinga, which are not seen as agricultural frontiers, increased their impacts. The most optimistic scenarios for the future have been those in regions considered agricultural frontiers; however, these are the regions where agriculture is more technologically developed, for example, coffee production in the Atlantic Forest and in the Cerrado. The results indicate that the technological development of agriculture can contribute to mitigating the impacts of damage to biodiversity in the future, and that the implementation of legislative and inspection measures is fundamental to supporting the correct use of the soil and preventing illegal soil change. Otherwise, in the future, we will see the increasing disappearance of species. Thus, we need re-searchers, farmers, and policy makers to move from development to conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Wild boar diet and its implications on agriculture and biodiversity in Brazilian forest-grassland ecoregions
    Cervo, I. B.
    Guadagnin, D. L.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 43 (01) : 123 - 136
  • [2] Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
    Garcia Lucas, Kassio R.
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Ventura, Mauricio Ursi
    Pereira Andrade, Edilene
    Ralisch, Ricardo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 127
  • [3] Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends
    Ruviaro, Clandio F.
    Gianezini, Miguelangelo
    Brandao, Fernanda S.
    Winck, Cesar A.
    Dewes, Homero
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 28 : 9 - 24
  • [4] Life cycle assessment as a prospective tool for sustainable agriculture and food planning at a local level
    Lulovicova, Andrea
    Bouissou, Stephane
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (02) : 251 - 264
  • [5] Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Circular Agriculture: A Case Study in Fuqing, China
    Fan, Weiguo
    Zhang, Peng
    Xu, Zihan
    Wei, Hejie
    Lu, Nachuan
    Wang, Xuechao
    Weng, Boqi
    Chen, Zhongdian
    Wu, Feilong
    Dong, Xiaobin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Impact of Biochar Implementation in Conservation Agriculture in Zambia
    Sparrevik, Magnus
    Field, John L.
    Martinsen, Vegard
    Breedveld, Gijs D.
    Cornelissen, Gerard
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (03) : 1206 - 1215
  • [7] Screening life cycle impact assessment with weighting methodology based on simplified damage functions
    Itsubo N.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2000, 5 (5) : 273 - 280
  • [8] Evaluation of technical improvements of photovoltaic systems through life cycle assessment methodology
    Battisti, R
    Corrado, A
    [J]. ENERGY, 2005, 30 (07) : 952 - 967
  • [9] Environmental impact of Brazilian broiler production process: Evaluation using life cycle assessment
    da Silva Lima, Nilsa Duarte
    Naas, Irenilza de Alencar
    Garcia, Rodrigo Garofallo
    de Moura, Daniella Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [10] Mapping agriculture's impact by combining farm management handbooks, life-cycle assessment and search engine science
    Navarro, Javier
    Bryan, Brett A.
    Marinoni, Oswald
    Eady, Sandra
    Halog, Anthony
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 80 : 54 - 65