A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones

被引:2
|
作者
Jose, Esther [1 ]
Agarwal, Puneet [2 ]
Zhuang, Jun [1 ]
Swaminathan, Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Performance evaluation; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Railways; Ranking; FUZZY AXIOMATIC DESIGN; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EVALUATION MODEL; TRANSPORTATION; EFFICIENCY; AHP; SELECTION; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-022-04866-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Indian Railways is India's biggest employer and undeniably influences the country's transportation network, economy, and social and cultural systems. The network is split into zones for operational reasons. It is vital to evaluate these railway networks to identify their strengths and shortcomings and to improve their performance. Past works often use Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate railway services. Our contribution lies in the inclusion of several aspects not previously considered, such as (i) both tangible and intangible criteria, (ii) the hierarchical nature of the problem, and (iii) additional useful criteria and data to analyze the performance of the zones, including physical assets, operating ratio, accidents, comfort, travel experience, flexibility, transparency, etc. We use the novel Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design method to evaluate the performance of sixteen zones in the Indian Railways since it suits our problem well. We find that the Southern Railway zone performs best, while the Northeast Frontier zone is ranked last. We also identify the strengths and weaknesses of all railway zones.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1168
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluating the performance of Indian railway zones
    Esther Jose
    Puneet Agarwal
    Jun Zhuang
    Jose Swaminathan
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 325 : 1133 - 1168
  • [2] Evaluating Government Websites Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Buyukozkan, Guelcin
    9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 190 - 199
  • [3] Evaluating and ranking the Indian private sector banks-A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Sama, Hanumantha Rao
    Kosuri, Sri Venkateswara Kumar
    Kalvakolanu, Sripathi
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2022, 22 (02)
  • [4] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry
    C. W. Hsu
    R. J. Kuo
    C. Y. Chiou
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 11 : 775 - 784
  • [5] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry
    Hsu, C. W.
    Kuo, R. J.
    Chiou, C. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 11 (03) : 775 - 784
  • [6] An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Wind Farm Performance
    Kang, He-Yau
    Hung, Meng-Chan
    Pearn, W. L.
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Kang, Mei-Sung
    ENERGIES, 2011, 4 (11) : 2002 - 2026
  • [7] Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Tyagi, Aman
    Singh, Preetvanti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [8] AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE BY MULTI-CRITERIA
    Yuksel, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2015, 30 (03): : 429 - 441
  • [9] Evaluating digital maturity in specialized enterprises: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Zhu, Yanmin
    Wan, Huanyu
    Carlos, Llopis-Albert
    Ye, Junhong
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2025, 21 (01)
  • [10] Evaluating demand forecasting models using multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Badulescu, Yvonne
    Hameri, Ari-Pekka
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 18 (05) : 661 - 683