Comparison of Different NDT Techniques for Evaluation of the Quality of PCBs Produced Using Traditional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies

被引:0
|
作者
Jasiuniene, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Raisutis, Renaldas [2 ,3 ]
Samaitis, Vykintas [2 ]
Jankauskas, Audrius [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Studentu St 50, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Kaunas Univ Technol, Prof K Barsauskas Ultrasound Res Inst, K Barsausko St 59, LT-51423 Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Kaunas Univ Technol, Dept Elect Power Syst, Studentu St 50, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
PCB; quality; nondestructive testing; additive manufacturing; ultrasonic; radiography; acoustic microscopy; thermography; THERMOGRAPHY; CIRCUITS;
D O I
10.3390/s24061719
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Multilayer printed circuit boards (PCBs) can be produced not only in the traditional way but also additively. Both traditional and additive manufacturing can lead to invisible defects in the internal structure of the electronic component, eventually leading to the spontaneous failure of the device. No matter what kind of technology is used for the production of PCBs, when they are used in important structures, quality control is important to ensure the reliability of the component. The nondestructive testing (NDT) of the structure of manufactured electronic components can help ensure the quality of devices. Investigations of possible changes in the structure of the product can help identify the causes of defects. Different types of manufacturing technologies can lead to diverse types of possible defects. Therefore, employing several nondestructive inspection techniques could be preferable for the inspection of electronic components. In this article, we present a comparison of various NDT techniques for the evaluation of the quality of PCBs produced using traditional and additive manufacturing technologies. The methodology for investigating the internal structure of PCBs is based on several of the most reliable and widely used technologies, namely, acoustic microscopy, active thermography, and radiography. All of the technologies investigated have their advantages and disadvantages, so if high-reliability products are to be produced, it would be advantageous to carry out tests using multiple technologies in order to detect the various types of defects and determine their parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT NDT TECHNIQUES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS FABRICATED BY ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Oliveira, J. P.
    Inacio, Patrick L.
    Crivellaro, Fernando
    Simao, Carlos P.
    Camacho, E.
    Miranda, Rosa M.
    Velhinho, A.
    Braz Fernandes, F. M.
    Santos, Telmo G.
    [J]. IRF2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEGRITY-RELIABILITY-FAILURE, 2018, : 997 - 998
  • [2] Comparison of Quality of Porous Structure Specimens Produced by Different Additive Technologies and from Different Materials
    Tkac, Jozef
    Toth, Teodor
    Mizera, Ondrej
    Molnar, Vieroslav
    Fedorko, Gabriel
    Dovica, Miroslav
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [3] Enhancing wear performance: A comparative study of traditional vs. additive manufacturing techniques for 17-4pH SS
    Garcia-Hernandez, Celia
    Naranjo, Juan Alfonso
    Castro-Sastre, Maria Angeles
    Berges, Cristina
    Fernandez-Abia, A. I.
    Martin-Pedrosa, Fernando
    Herranz, Gemma
    Garcia-Cabezon, Cristina
    [J]. WEAR, 2024, 540
  • [4] A Detailed Properties Comparison of an Automotive Sealant Nozzle Produced Using Three Metal Additive Manufacturing Technologies
    Ortiz-Canavate, Jaime
    Ferrandiz, Santiago
    Bloem, Carlos A.
    Igual, Javier
    Blasco, Jose Ramon
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (15)
  • [5] Comparison of residual stresses obtained by the crack compliance method for parts produced by different metal additive manufacturing techniques and after friction stir processing
    Zhao, Lv
    Macias, Juan Guillermo Santos
    Dolimont, Adrien
    Simar, Aude
    Riviere-Lorphevre, Edouard
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
  • [6] Comparison of residual stresses obtained by the crack compliance method for parts produced by different metal additive manufacturing techniques and after friction stir processing
    Zhao, Lv
    Santos Macías, Juan Guillermo
    Dolimont, Adrien
    Simar, Aude
    Rivière-Lorphèvre, Edouard
    [J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 36
  • [7] Laboratory Evaluation of Production Efficiency for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Using In-House Casting vs Outsourced Additive Manufacturing Techniques
    Ali, Zaid
    Wood, Duncan
    Elmougy, Abdulrahman
    Kelleher, Paul
    Martin, Nicolas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (03) : 338 - 342
  • [8] Comparison of Biological Age Prediction Models Using Clinical Biomarkers Commonly Measured in Clinical Practice Settings: AI Techniques Vs. Traditional Statistical Methods
    Bae, Chul-Young
    Im, Yoori
    Lee, Jonghoon
    Park, Choong-Shik
    Kim, Miyoung
    Kwon, Hojeong
    Kim, Boseon
    Park, Hye ri
    Lee, Chun-Koo
    Kim, Inhee
    Kim, Jeonghoon
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ANALYTICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 1
  • [9] BIOT 2-Head-to-head comparison of production and quality data for Mabs produced in Hyclone 250L single-use-bioreactors vs. traditional cell culture bioreactors
    Hudson, Terry
    Allotta, Terrence
    Myint, Thomas
    Giandomenico, Donna
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 236
  • [10] Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of 3D Printed Mandibular Model Using Two Different Additive Manufacturing Techniques Based on Ultralow Dose Multislice Computed Tomography Scan Data: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
    Hesham, Noran M.
    Kandil, Hossam A. M.
    Dakhli, Iman I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 14 (01): : 86 - 93