Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine Versus Opiates in the Treatment of Patients with Renal Colic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Dongxu [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Pu [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xia, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xiaopeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Urol, 8 Gongti South Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Inst Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Inst Infect Dis, Beijing Key Lab Emerging Infect Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Inst Infect Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Ditan Hosp, Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Beijing 100015, Peoples R China
关键词
Meta-analysis; Ketamine; Opioid peptides; Renal colic; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review; Emergency; Kidney calculi; Pain management; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; INTRANASAL KETAMINE; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PAIN; ANALGESIA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s40122-023-00530-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionRenal colic is one of the most common urological emergencies, and is usually caused by ureteral colic spasms. Pain management in renal colic remains the central focus of emergency treatment. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to identify the efficacy and safety of ketamine versus opioids in the treatment of patients with renal colic.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that referred to the use of ketamine and opioids for patients with renal colic. The methodology was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to analyze the data. The results were pooled using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported pain scores 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after drug administration. The secondary outcome measure was side effects.ResultsThe data analysis revealed that ketamine was similar to opioids in pain intensity at the time of 5 min post-dose (MD = - 0.40, 95% CI - 1.82 to 1.01, P = 0.57), 15 min post-dose (MD = - 0.15, 95% CI - 0.82 to 0.52, P = 0.67), 30 min post-dose (MD = 0.38, 95% CI - 0.25 to 1.01, P = 0.24). Also, the pain score of ketamine was better than that of opioids at 60 min after administration (MD = - 0.12, 95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.02, P = 0.02). As for safety, the ketamine group was linked to a significant decrease in the incidence of hypotensive (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.65, P = 0.02). The two groups did not statistically differ in the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.ConclusionsCompared with opioids, ketamine showed a longer duration of analgesia in renal colic, with satisfactory safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1093
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine Versus Opiates in the Treatment of Patients with Renal Colic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dongxu Zhang
    Pu Liang
    Bowen Xia
    Xin Zhang
    Xiaopeng Hu
    [J]. Pain and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 1079 - 1093
  • [2] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ketamine versus morphine for the treatment of acute pain
    Song, Cheng
    Wang, Dong
    Chen, Bin
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (1-2) : 77 - 86
  • [3] The Efficacy and Safety of Mizoribine versus Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Hua
    Yin, Wenjun
    Xu, Zhengguang
    Chen, Zekai
    Yiu, Wingkeung
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in Renal Colic Caused by Urinary Calculi in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qu, Zhicheng
    Wang, Tianyuan
    Tu, Jianfeng
    Yao, Weihai
    Pei, Xiaolu
    Jia, Liancheng
    Cao, Ying
    Liu, Cunzhi
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bahji, Anees
    Zarate, Carlos A.
    Vazquez, Gustavo H.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 21 (06) : 853 - 866
  • [6] Tamsulosin efficacy and safety for conservative management of renal colic: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Benitez Camps, Mencia
    Cerain Herrero, M. Jesus
    de Miguel Llorente, Noemi
    Martorell Sole, Elisabet
    Flores Mateo, Gemma
    Pedro Pijoan, Anna M.
    Murillo-Huapaya, Carlos
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2015, 145 (06): : 239 - 247
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad
    Ahmad, Aya Hisham Moussa
    Kohaf, Neveen A.
    Aboutaleb, Aya
    Kumar, Danisha
    Elsaeidy, Khaled Saad
    Mohamed, Ola saeed
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Shehata, Islam Mohammad
    [J]. CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (04) : 211 - 227
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmed Saad Elsaeidy
    Aya Hisham Moussa Ahmad
    Neveen A. Kohaf
    Aya Aboutaleb
    Danisha Kumar
    Khaled Saad Elsaeidy
    Ola saeed Mohamed
    Alan D. Kaye
    Islam Mohammad Shehata
    [J]. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2024, 28 : 211 - 227
  • [9] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Safety and Efficacy of Cediranib in the Treatment of Cancer Patients
    Wang, Yan
    Cai, Yan
    Wang, Qi-Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 2023
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pereira, Jose Eduardo Guimaraes
    Pereira, Lucas Ferreira Gomes
    Linhares, Rafael Mercante
    Bersot, Carlos Darcy Alves
    Aslanidis, Theodoros
    Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 1011 - 1037