Environmental quality evaluation based on the TODIM method with normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set

被引:3
|
作者
Song, Chenyang [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
Zhang, Yixin [3 ]
Li, Bo [4 ]
机构
[1] Army Aviat Inst, Beijing 101100, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610016, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Stat & Math, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set; Distance measure; TODIM method; Environmental quality evaluation; DECISION-MAKING; NEURAL BASIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-023-08155-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set (NWHFS) is one of the latest extensions of hesitant fuzzy set (HFS). It can depict experts' preference information consisting of several possible values and the potential information dug in the traditional hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) at the same time. However, traditional aggregation operators of NWHFSs always ignore the influence of psychological behaviors. Therefore, to make use of the potential information and manage the applications with incomplete rationality, this paper combines the advantages of TODIM (TOmada deDecisao Iterativa Multicriterio) method and NWHFSs. Considering the structures and characteristics of NWHFSs, we also provide the definition of distance measure of NWHFSs. Based on this, we develop an improved TODIM method. The specific implementation process is also provided. Finally, we apply the improved TODIM method to the environmental quality evaluation. The comparison result with traditional aggregation operators indicates that the proposed method can enlarge the competitive relationship better. It also demonstrates the rationality and accuracy of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:8161 / 8173
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental quality evaluation based on the TODIM method with normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set
    Chenyang Song
    Zeshui Xu
    Yixin Zhang
    Bo Li
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2023, 27 : 8161 - 8173
  • [2] Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to environmental quality evaluation
    Ren, Zhiliang
    Xu, Zeshui
    Wang, Hai
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 159 : 286 - 297
  • [3] Normal Wiggly Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Information for Environmental Quality Evaluation
    Noor, Qasim
    Alrowaili, Dalal Awadh
    Rashid, Tabasam
    Husnine, Syed Muhammad
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021
  • [4] Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy TODIM approach for multiple attribute decision making
    Liu, Peide
    Zhang, Pei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (01) : 627 - 644
  • [5] Normal Wiggly Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set and Its Application in Battlefield Threat Assessment
    Xia, Jingyang
    Chen, Mengqi
    Fang, Weiguo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 25 (01) : 145 - 167
  • [6] Normal Wiggly Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set and Its Application in Battlefield Threat Assessment
    Jingyang Xia
    Mengqi Chen
    Weiguo Fang
    [J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2023, 25 : 145 - 167
  • [7] Extended TODIM method based on normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets for deducing optimal reinforcement condition of agro-waste fibers for green product development
    Zindani, Divya
    Maity, Saikat Ranjan
    Bhowmik, Sumit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 301
  • [8] A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TODIM Method Based on a Score Function
    Wei, Cuiping
    Ren, Zhiliang
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (04) : 701 - 712
  • [9] A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TODIM Method Based on a Score Function
    Cuiping Wei
    Zhiliang Ren
    Rosa M. Rodríguez
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 701 - 712
  • [10] Fuzzy Reliability Based on Hesitant and Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Set Evaluation
    Kumar, Akshay
    Bisht, Soni
    Goyal, Nupur
    Ram, Mangey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2021, 6 (01) : 166 - 179