Evaluating extinction risk in Tasmania's vascular flora using rapid IUCN Red List assessments

被引:1
|
作者
Quarmby, J. [1 ]
Kutt, A. S. [2 ]
Dickson, C. R. [1 ,3 ]
Hamer, R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tasmanian Land Conservancy, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Dept Environm & Genet, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
关键词
Common Assessment Method; ConR; flora; IUCN Red List; prioritisation; rapid assessment; Tasmania; threatened species; PLANT CONSERVATION; GLOBAL STRATEGY; AUSTRALIA; HABITATS; DECLINE; THREATS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1071/PC23005
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Context The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List categories and criteria are a widely accepted standard for assessing extinction risk and have been adopted by many countries, including Australia. Tasmania is globally renowned for its biodiversity, and yet very few of its plant species have been evaluated using IUCN criteria, exposing a significant gap in conservation prioritisation.Aims This study aimed to undertake a regional IUCN assessment of Tasmania's vascular flora and highlight gaps and discrepancies in accepted lists of threatened species.Methods The R package ConR was used to automatically generate preliminary IUCN assessments for 1885 taxa based on Criterion B (geographic range). This was compared to current listing status to identify potentially misaligned or at-risk taxa. Protected areas were incorporated into the analysis, and heatmaps were used to show the distribution of threatened flora in Tasmania based on their preliminary IUCN category.Key results One-third of Tasmania's vascular flora (570 taxa) were categorised as threatened by ConR, of which only 47% are currently listed under legislation. We identify 301 non-listed taxa that are potentially threatened and can now be prioritised for full IUCN assessments. Taxa categorised as threatened are more likely to occur near cities and towns, often outside of formal protected areas.Conclusion and implications Automated IUCN assessments are a useful means of systematically refining lists of threatened species. The adoption of IUCN categories and criteria is likely to have a substantial effect on current lists of threatened species and could shift the focus of conservation efforts. Tasmania is globally renowned for its biodiversity, but many of its plant species are at risk of extinction. Using rapid IUCN Red List assessments, we identify 570 threatened plant species, equivalent to 30% of the island's flora. Less than half of these species are currently listed as threatened under legislation. We find that threatened plants are concentrated near urban areas, and outside of protected areas.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments
    Ronsted, Nina
    Walsh, Seana K.
    Clark, Margaret
    Edmonds, Merlin
    Flynn, Tim
    Heintzman, Scott
    Loomis, Alexander
    Lorence, David
    Nagendra, Uma
    Nyberg, Ben
    Opgenorth, Michael
    Weisenberger, Lauren
    Williams, Adam
    Wolkis, Dustin
    Wood, Kenneth R.
    Keir, Matthew
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (04)
  • [2] Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List
    Collen, Ben
    Dulvy, Nicholas K.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Gardenfors, Ulf
    Keith, David A.
    Punt, Andre E.
    Regan, Helen M.
    Bohm, Monika
    Hedges, Simon
    Seddon, Mary
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Bachman, Steven P.
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (04)
  • [3] Evaluating firefly extinction risk: Initial red list assessments for North America
    Fallon, Candace E.
    Walker, Anna C.
    Lewis, Sara
    Cicero, Joseph
    Faust, Lynn
    Heckscher, Christopher M.
    Perez-Hernandez, Cisteil X.
    Pfeiffer, Ben
    Jepsen, Sarina
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [4] Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians
    Lucas, Pablo
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Cazalis, Victor
    Luedtke, Jennifer
    Neam, Kelsey
    Brown, Mary
    Langhammer, Penny
    Mancini, Giordano
    Santini, Luca
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (06)
  • [5] Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments
    Syfert, Mindy M.
    Joppa, Lucas
    Smith, Matthew J.
    Coomes, David A.
    Bachman, Steven P.
    Brummitt, Neil A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 177 : 174 - 184
  • [6] Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria
    Keith, David A.
    Mahony, Michael
    Hines, Harry
    Elith, Jane
    Regan, Tracey J.
    Baumgartner, John B.
    Hunter, David
    Heard, Geoffrey W.
    Mitchell, Nicola J.
    Parris, Kirsten M.
    Penman, Trent
    Scheele, Ben
    Simpson, Christopher C.
    Tingley, Reid
    Tracy, Christopher R.
    West, Matt
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) : 810 - 819
  • [7] Comparing the IUCN's EICAT and Red List to improve assessments of the impact of biological invasions
    Van der Colff, Dewidine
    Kumschick, Sabrina
    Foden, Wendy
    Wilson, John R. U.
    NEOBIOTA, 2020, (62) : 509 - 523
  • [8] Extinction risk categorization in the IUCN Red List: Comment on " The US Endangered Species Act and acceptable risk"
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 299
  • [9] Developing a standard for evaluating reintroduction success using IUCN Red List indices
    Shier, D. M.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (05) : 411 - 412
  • [10] Using IUCN criteria to perform rapid assessments of at-risk taxa
    Tom D. Le Breton
    Heidi C. Zimmer
    Rachael V. Gallagher
    Michelle Cox
    Stuart Allen
    Tony D. Auld
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2019, 28 : 863 - 883