Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice

被引:3
|
作者
Caliskan, Elif Buse [1 ,2 ]
Bingel, Ulrike [1 ]
Kunkel, Angelika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Hosp Essen, Ctr Translat Neuro & Behav Sci C TNBS, Dept Neurol, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Neurol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
Placebo; Nocebo; Nocebo hyperalgesia; Placebo analgesia; Treatment expectation; Expectation; OPEN-LABEL PLACEBO; HEALTHY MALE; PAIN; RESPONSES; EXPECTATION; MECHANISMS; HYPERALGESIA; MODULATION; ACTIVATION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1097/PR9.0000000000001142
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Positive and negative treatment expectations are powerful modulators of health and treatment outcomes. A substantial part of treatment success is due to contextual factors modulating patient's expectations towards a treatment. Consequently, treatment expectations should be a target of therapeutic interventions themselves. Objectives: This article highlights the neurobiological underpinnings of treatment expectations as well as strategies to modulate contextual factors to optimize treatment outcomes in daily clinical settings. Methods: This clinical update aligns with the 2022 IASP Global Year Translating Pain Knowledge into Practice and selectively reviews the best available evidence and practice. Results: The effects of treatment expectations, also known as placebo and nocebo effects, are observed in various clinical conditions and physiological systems. However, most of our knowledge comes from the field of pain, where expectation effects substantially contribute to overall analgesic treatment outcomes. Experimental placebo analgesia paradigms provide the best illustration of how analgesic effects can be attributed not only to a pharmacological or specific treatment, but instead are the result of the expectation towards the treatment. The impact of expectations on treatment outcome is highly variable between individuals, and the identification of factors predicting an individual's response has proven to be challenging. Further research is required to provide personalized treatment strategies for the daily clinical practice. Conclusion: Patient's previous experiences and expectations are powerful modulators of treatment efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. By providing a comprehensive overview of recent advances in this field, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to improve patient-clinician interaction.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    Colloca, Luana
    Blease, Charlotte
    Annoni, Marco
    Atlas, Lauren Y.
    Benedetti, Fabrizio
    Bingel, Ulrike
    Buechel, Christian
    Carvalho, Claudia
    Colagiuri, Ben
    Crum, Alia J.
    Enck, Paul
    Gaab, Jens
    Geers, Andrew L.
    Howick, Jeremy
    Jensen, Karin B.
    Kirsch, Irving
    Meissner, Karin
    Napadow, Vitaly
    Peerdeman, Kaya J.
    Raz, Amir
    Rief, Winfried
    Vase, Lene
    Wager, Tor D.
    Wampold, Bruce E.
    Weimer, Katja
    Wiech, Katja
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Klinger, Regine
    Kelley, John M.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2018, 87 (04) : 204 - 210
  • [2] Placebo and nocebo effects in the neurological practice
    Bittar, Caroline
    Nascimento, Osvaldo J. M.
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2015, 73 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [3] An Exploration of Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical Students and Rheumatologists to Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Threshold Concepts in Clinical Practice
    Arnold, Mark H.
    Finniss, Damien
    Luscombe, Georgina M.
    Kerridge, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 7
  • [4] PLACEBO/NOCEBO RESPONSES IN CLINICAL TRIALS AND PRACTICE
    Warner, J. O.
    [J]. CURRENT ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 36 (04) : 242 - 246
  • [5] "Consensus on Placebo and Nocebo Effects Connects Science with Practice:" Reply to "Questioning the Consensus on Placebo and Nocebo Effects"
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    Colloca, Luana
    Blease, Charlotte
    Gaab, Jens
    Jensen, Karin B.
    Atlas, Lauren Y.
    Beedie, Chris J.
    Benedetti, Fabrizio
    Bingel, Ulrike
    Buchel, Christian
    Bussemaker, Jet
    Colagiuri, Ben
    Crum, Alia J.
    Finniss, Damien G.
    Geers, Andrew L.
    Howick, Jeremy
    Klinger, Regine
    Meeuwis, Stefanie Helena
    Meissner, Karin
    Napadow, Vitaly
    Petrie, Keith J.
    Rief, Winfried
    Smeets, Ionica
    Wager, Tor D.
    Wanigasekera, Vishvarani
    Vase, Lene
    Kelley, John M.
    Kirsch, Irving
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2021, 90 (03) : 213 - 214
  • [6] Nocebo vs Placebo Effects: Their Clinical Relevance
    Tavel, Morton E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 135 (11): : 1296 - 1299
  • [7] Placebo and Nocebo Effects
    Kiese-Himmel, Christiane
    [J]. SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2020, 44 (04): : 172 - 174
  • [8] Placebo and Nocebo Effects
    Colloca, Luana
    Barsky, Arthur J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (06): : 554 - 561
  • [9] Concerning Nocebo vs Placebo Effects: Their Clinical Relevance
    Blankfield, Robert P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 136 (08): : E163 - E163
  • [10] Nocebo/Placebo Effects in Dental Practice: Two Key Protagonists
    Chavarria-Bolanos, Daniel
    Pozos-Guillen, Amaury
    Montero Aguilar, Mauricio
    [J]. ODOVTOS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2019, 21 (03) : 10 - 15