Surrogate models of radiative transfer codes for atmospheric trace gas retrievals from satellite observations

被引:1
|
作者
Brence, Jure [1 ,2 ]
Tanevski, Jovan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Adams, Jennifer [5 ,6 ]
Malina, Edward [7 ]
Dzeroski, Saso [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Jozef Stefan Int Postgrad Sch, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] RHEA Grp Spa, Frascati, Italy
[6] ESA, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy
[7] ESA, ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands
[8] ESA, ESRIN, Lab, Frascati, Italy
关键词
Surrogate models; Dimensionality reduction; Intrinsic dimensionality; Radiative transfer; Satellite data; Neural networks; Tree ensembles; SENTINEL-5; PRECURSOR; TROPOMI; METHANE; MISSION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s10994-022-06155-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs) is key to interpreting satellite observations of air quality and greenhouse gases, but is computationally expensive. Surrogate models that emulate the full forward physical RTM can speed up the simulation, reducing computational and timing costs and allowing the use of more advanced physics for trace gas retrievals. In this study, we present the development of surrogate models for two RTMs: the RemoTeC algorithm using the LINTRAN RTM and the SCIATRAN RTM. We estimate the intrinsic dimensionality of the input and output spaces and embed them in lower dimensional subspaces to facilitate the learning task. Two methods are tested for dimensionality reduction, autoencoders and principle component analysis (PCA), with PCA consistently outperforming autoencoders. Different sampling methods are employed for generating the training datasets: sampling focused on expected atmospheric parameters and latin hypercube sampling. The results show that models trained on the smaller (n = 1000) uniformly sampled dataset can perform as well as those trained on the larger (n = 50000), more focused dataset. Surrogate models for both datasets are able to accurately emulate Sentinel 5P spectra within a millisecond or less, as compared to the minutes or hours needed to simulate the full physical model. The SCIATRAN-trained forward surrogate models are able to generalize the emulation to a broader set of parameters and can be used for less constrained applications, while achieving a normalized RMSE of 7.3%. On the other hand, models trained on the LINTRAN dataset can completely replace the RTM simulation in more focused expected ranges of atmospheric parameters, as they achieve a normalized RMSE of 0.3%.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1363
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surrogate models of radiative transfer codes for atmospheric trace gas retrievals from satellite observations
    Jure Brence
    Jovan Tanevski
    Jennifer Adams
    Edward Malina
    Sašo Džeroski
    [J]. Machine Learning, 2023, 112 : 1337 - 1363
  • [2] Spatial Retrievals of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide from Satellite Observations
    Hobbs, Jonathan
    Katzfuss, Matthias
    Zilber, Daniel
    Brynjarsdottir, Jenny
    Mondal, Anirban
    Berrocal, Veronica
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 17
  • [3] A Geostatistical Framework for Quantifying the Imprint of Mesoscale Atmospheric Transport on Satellite Trace Gas Retrievals
    Torres, Anthony D.
    Keppel-Aleks, Gretchen
    Doney, Scott C.
    Fendrock, Michaela
    Luis, Kelly
    De Maziere, Martine
    Hase, Frank
    Petri, Christof
    Pollard, David F.
    Roehl, Coleen M.
    Sussmann, Ralf
    Velazco, Voltaire A.
    Warneke, Thorsten
    Wunch, Debra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (17-18) : 9773 - 9795
  • [4] A linearized vector radiative transfer model for atmospheric trace gas retrieval
    Hasekamp, OP
    Landgraf, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2002, 75 (02): : 221 - 238
  • [5] Sensitivity of trace gas abundances retrievals from infrared limb emission spectra to simplifying approximations in radiative transfer modelling
    Stiller, GP
    von Clarmann, T
    Funke, B
    Glatthor, N
    Hase, F
    Höpfner, M
    Linden, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2002, 72 (03): : 249 - 280
  • [6] Evaluation of approximative radiative transfer models intended for retrievals from limb measurements
    Kaiser, JW
    Rozanov, AV
    Rozanov, VV
    Burrows, JP
    [J]. IRS 2000: CURRENT PROBLEMS IN ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION, 2001, : 417 - 420
  • [7] Comparison of the seasonal change in cloud-radiative forcing from atmospheric general circulation models and satellite observations
    Cess, RD
    Zhang, MH
    Potter, GL
    Alekseev, V
    Barker, HW
    Bony, S
    Colman, RA
    Dazlich, DA
    DelGenio, AD
    Deque, M
    Dix, MR
    Dymnikov, V
    Esch, M
    Fowler, LD
    Fraser, JR
    Galin, V
    Gates, WL
    Hack, JJ
    Ingram, WJ
    Kiehl, JT
    Kim, Y
    LeTreut, H
    Liang, XZ
    McAvaney, BJ
    Meleshko, VP
    Morcrette, JJ
    Randall, DA
    Roeckner, E
    Schlesinger, ME
    Sporyshev, PV
    Taylor, KE
    Timbal, B
    Volodin, EM
    Wang, W
    Wang, WC
    Wetherald, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D14) : 16593 - 16603
  • [8] EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 CONCENTRATIONS FROM MODELS AND SATELLITE RETRIEVALS
    Jing, Yingying
    Shi, Jiancheng
    Wang, Tianxing
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2015, : 2202 - 2205
  • [9] Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes
    Clough, SA
    Shephard, MW
    Mlawer, E
    Delamere, JS
    Iacono, M
    Cady-Pereira, K
    Boukabara, S
    Brown, PD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2005, 91 (02): : 233 - 244
  • [10] PERORMANCE EVALUATION OF RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODELS OF SATELLITE ATMOSPHERIC MICROWAVE SOUNDING FOR DATA ASSIMILATION
    Li, Gongwei
    Chen, Ke
    Gasiewski, Albin J.
    Zhang, Kun
    Li, Qingxia
    Zhang, Li
    He, Ye
    Cao, Anjie
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 2189 - 2192