Effect of humic acid and fulvic acid on mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer stabilized soft soil

被引:4
|
作者
Luo, Zhengdong [1 ]
Zhang, Benben [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiangtan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Xiangtan 411105, Peoples R China
关键词
Geopolymer stabilized soft soil; Humic acid; Fulvic acid; Mechanical characteristics; Durability; FLY-ASH; CEMENT; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; SODIUM; PERFORMANCE; CLAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133875
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geopolymer with eco-friendly and excellent performance is regarded as a new generation of soil stabilizer. Although geopolymer is effective in improving the mechanical and durability properties of soft soil, the mech-anism of the influence of organic matter (humic acid and fulvic acid) in soft soil is often neglected. Therefore, in this work, the effects of different contents (0%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 3.5%, 4.5%, 5.5%) of humic acid and fulvic acid on the mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer stabilized soft soil (GSSS) were elucidated. The mechanical characteristics, durability and microstructure of GSSS were characterized by UCS test, sulphate so-lution attack test, XRD and SEM analysis. The samples for the UCS test were cured in a standard curing box (temperature regulated at 20 +/- 2 celcius and humidity not less than 95%) for 7 d/28 d, while the samples for the sulphate solution attack test were cured in a standard curing box for 28 d beforehand. The results demonstrated that there existed a limit content (4.5% and 3.5%) for the effect of humic acid and fulvic acid on the UCS of GSSS, respectively, beyond which the UCS of GSSS almost ceased to change with the increase of humic acid and fulvic acid contents. With the increase of organic matter content, the damage mode of GSSS changed from brittle damage to plastic damage accompanied by the decrease of peak stress. After exposure to Na2SO4 solution, the UCS deterioration rate of GSSS incorporated with fulvic acid was faster compared to humic acid when the organic matter content did not exceed 2.5%, while the opposite was true when the organic matter content exceeded 2.5%.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OCURRENCE OF ALKANES IN FULVIC ACID, A SOIL HUMIC FRACTION
    OGNER, G
    SCHNITZE.M
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1970, 34 (08) : 921 - &
  • [2] Differential responses of the properties of soil humic acid and fulvic acid to nitrogen addition in the North China Plain
    Kou, Bing
    Hui, Kunlong
    Miao, Fang
    He, Yue
    Qu, Chengtun
    Yuan, Ying
    Tan, Wenbing
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 214
  • [3] Fulvic acid more facilitated the soil electron transfer than humic acid
    Yang, Side
    Wang, Kai
    Yu, Xin
    Xu, Yan
    Ye, Huike
    Bai, Mohan
    Zhao, Lixia
    Sun, Yang
    Li, Xiaojing
    Li, Yongtao
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2024, 469
  • [4] The Effect of Humic Acid and Fulvic Acid on Adsorption-Desorption Behavior of Copper and Zinc in the Yellow Soil
    Wang, Zhantai
    Cao, Minxia
    Cai, Wenchang
    Zeng, Heping
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS, MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS I, 2017, 1820
  • [5] Enhanced arsenic migration in tailings soil with the addition of humic acid, fulvic acid and thiol-modified humic acid
    Qian, Guangren
    Xu, Lu
    Li, Nuo
    Wang, Kaili
    Qu, Yangwei
    Xu, Yunfeng
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 286
  • [6] FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS ON CHEMISTRY OF FULVIC ACID, A SOIL HUMIC FRACTION
    KHAN, SU
    SCHNITZE.M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 1971, 49 (13): : 2302 - &
  • [7] REACTIONS BETWEEN FULVIC ACID A SOIL HUMIC COMPOUND AND MONTMORILLONITE
    SCHNITZER, M
    KODAMA, H
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 1969, 7 (01) : 141 - +
  • [8] OCCURRENCE OF FATTY ACIDS IN FULVIC ACID, A SOIL HUMIC FRACTION
    SCHNITZE.M
    OGNER, G
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 1970, 8 (03) : 505 - &
  • [9] CORRELATION BETWEEN HUMIC ACID AND FULVIC ACID
    PETRUZZELLI, G
    GUIDI, G
    SEQUI, P
    AGROCHIMICA, 1974, 18 (1-2): : 156 - 163
  • [10] Effect of fulvic acid on the phosphorus availability in acid soil
    Yang, S.
    Zhang, Z.
    Cong, L.
    Wang, X.
    Shi, S.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2013, 13 (03) : 526 - 533