An interpretable multi-stage forecasting framework for energy consumption and CO2 emissions for the transportation sector

被引:9
|
作者
Qiao, Qingyao [2 ]
Eskandari, Hamidreza [1 ]
Saadatmand, Hassan [3 ]
Sahraei, Mohammad Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Swansea, Wales
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Elect Engn, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Univ Buraimi, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Al Buraimi, Oman
关键词
Energy consumption forecasting; CO2 emissions forecasting; Transportation sector; Machine learning; Feature selection; FEATURE-SELECTION; MACHINE; METHODOLOGY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129499
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The transportation sector is deemed one of the primary sources of energy consumption and greenhouse gases throughout the world. To realise and design sustainable transport, it is imperative to comprehend relationships and evaluate interactions among a set of variables, which may influence transport energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Unlike recent published papers, this study strives to achieve a balance between machine learning (ML) model accuracy and model interpretability using the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method for forecasting the energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the UK's transportation sector. To this end, this paper proposes an interpretable multi -stage forecasting framework to simultaneously maximise the ML model accuracy and determine the relationship between the predictions and the influential variables by revealing the contribution of each variable to the predictions. For the UK's transportation sector, the experimental results indicate that road carbon intensity is found to be the most contributing variable to both energy consumption and CO2 emissions predictions. Unlike other studies, population and GDP per capita are found to be uninfluential variables. The proposed multi -stage forecasting framework may assist policymakers in making more informed energy decisions and establishing more accurate investment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An interpretable forecasting framework for energy consumption and CO2 emissions
    Aras, Serkan
    Van, M. Hanifi
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 328
  • [2] A modelling framework for the forecasting of energy consumption and CO2 emissions at local/regional level
    Marinakis, Vangelis
    Xidonas, Panos
    Doukas, Haris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2016, 39 (06) : 444 - 460
  • [3] Research on energy consumption and CO2 emission for transportation sector in China
    Huang, Yin
    Wang, Mengjun
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE, PTS 1-3, 2013, 253-255 : 1294 - 1298
  • [4] Uncertainty of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the building sector in China
    Guo, Yangyang
    Uhde, Helena
    Wen, Wen
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 97
  • [5] The Effect of Energy Consumption in the Agricultural Sector on CO2 Emissions in Malaysia
    Shaari, Mohd Shahidan
    Mariadas, Paul Anthony
    Hussain, Nor Ermawati
    Murthy, Uma
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (04): : 427 - 435
  • [6] An estimation of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in tourism sector of China
    Wu Pu
    Shi Peihua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 21 (04) : 733 - 745
  • [7] An estimation of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in tourism sector of China
    Pu Wu
    Peihua Shi
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21 : 733 - 745
  • [8] Forecast energy demand, CO2 emissions and energy resource impacts for the transportation sector
    Javanmard, M. Emami
    Tang, Y.
    Wang, Z.
    Tontiwachwuthikul, P.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 338
  • [9] Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil
    Pao, Hsiao-Tien
    Tsai, Chung-Ming
    [J]. ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) : 2450 - 2458
  • [10] Peak energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China's industrial sector
    Zhou, Sheng
    Wang, Yu
    Yuan, Zhiyi
    Ou, Xunmin
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 20 : 113 - 123