Does Directed Innovation Mitigate Climate Damage? Evidence from US Agriculture*

被引:16
|
作者
Moscona, Jacob [1 ,2 ]
Sastry, Karthik A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Act Lab, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS | 2023年 / 138卷 / 02期
关键词
RANDOM FLUCTUATIONS; ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; TECHNICAL CHANGE; CROP PRODUCTION; ADAPTATION; NECESSITY; MOTHER; OUTPUT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/qje/qjac039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article studies how innovation reacts to climate change and shapes its economic impacts, focusing on U.S. agriculture. We show in a model that directed innovation can either mitigate or exacerbate climate change's potential economic damage depending on the substitutability between new technology and favorable climatic conditions. To empirically investigate the technological response to climate change, we measure crop-specific exposure to damaging extreme temperatures and crop-specific innovation embodied in new variety releases and patents. We find that innovation has redirected since the mid-twentieth century toward crops with increasing exposure to extreme temperatures. Moreover, this effect is driven by types of agricultural technology most related to environmental adaptation. We next show that U.S. counties' exposure to induced innovation significantly dampens the local economic damage from extreme temperatures. Combining these estimates with the model, we find that directed innovation has offset 20% of potential losses in U.S. agricultural land value due to damaging climate trends since 1960 and that innovation could offset 13% of projected damage by 2100. These findings highlight the vital importance, but incomplete effectiveness, of endogenous technological change as a source of adaptation to climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 701
页数:65
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from US Agriculture
    Burke, Marshall
    Emerick, Kyle
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 8 (03) : 106 - 140
  • [2] Climate change and adaptation in agriculture: Evidence from US cropping patterns
    Cui, Xiaomeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 101
  • [3] Implications of climate change damage for agriculture: sectoral evidence from Pakistan
    Ahmed, Adeel
    Devadason, Evelyn S.
    Al-Amin, Abul Quasem
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (20) : 20688 - 20699
  • [4] Implications of climate change damage for agriculture: sectoral evidence from Pakistan
    Adeel Ahmed
    Evelyn S. Devadason
    Abul Quasem Al-Amin
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 : 20688 - 20699
  • [5] DOES THE SAMARITAN'S DILEMMA MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM US AGRICULTURE
    Deryugina, Tatyana
    Kirwan, Barrett
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2018, 56 (02) : 983 - 1006
  • [6] Does Innovation Foster or Mitigate the Corruption Obstacle? Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia
    Sdiri, Hanen
    Ayadi, Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (01) : 367 - 386
  • [7] Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? Evidence from China's private enterprises
    Zhang, Yuming
    Xing, Chao
    Wang, Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [8] Does climate governance affect waste disclosure? Evidence from the US
    Ahsan, Tanveer
    Albitar, Khaldoon
    Gull, Ammar Ali
    Hussainey, Khaled
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (43) : 5146 - 5162
  • [9] Does Innovation Foster or Mitigate the Corruption Obstacle? Firm-Level Evidence from Tunisia
    Hanen Sdiri
    Mohamed Ayadi
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2022, 13 : 367 - 386
  • [10] How does climate risk affect corporate innovation? Evidence from China
    Li, Bin
    Yao, Yao
    Usman, Muhammad
    Han, Miaodi
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023,