Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments

被引:3
|
作者
Ruesseler, Maria [1 ]
Weber, Lilian Aline [1 ,2 ]
Marshall, Tom Rhys [2 ,3 ]
O'Reilly, Jill [2 ]
Hunt, Laurence Tudor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Ctr Human Brain Act OHBA Univ, Wellcome Ctr Integrat Neuroimaging, Dept Psychiat,Warneford Hosp, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Anna Watts Bldg, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Human Brain Hlth, Birmingham, England
来源
ELIFE | 2023年 / 12卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
decision-making; temporal response function; EEG; random dot kinetogram; Human; EVIDENCE ACCUMULATION; PERCEPTUAL DECISION; SENSORY EVIDENCE; NEURAL BASIS; MODELS; FLUCTUATIONS; SURPRISE; REFLECT; HUMANS; MOTION;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.82823
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
During perceptual decision-making tasks, centroparietal electroencephalographic (EEG) potentials report an evidence accumulation-to-bound process that is time locked to trial onset. However, decisions in real-world environments are rarely confined to discrete trials; they instead unfold continuously, with accumulation of time-varying evidence being recency-weighted towards its immediate past. The neural mechanisms supporting recency-weighted continuous decision-making remain unclear. Here, we use a novel continuous task design to study how the centroparietal positivity (CPP) adapts to different environments that place different constraints on evidence accumulation. We show that adaptations in evidence weighting to these different environments are reflected in changes in the CPP. The CPP becomes more sensitive to fluctuations in sensory evidence when large shifts in evidence are less frequent, and the potential is primarily sensitive to fluctuations in decision-relevant (not decision-irrelevant) sensory input. A complementary triphasic component over occipito-parietal cortex encodes the sum of recently accumulated sensory evidence, and its magnitude covaries with parameters describing how different individuals integrate sensory evidence over time. A computational model based on leaky evidence accumulation suggests that these findings can be accounted for by a shift in decision threshold between different environments, which is also reflected in the magnitude of pre-decision EEG activity. Our findings reveal how adaptations in EEG responses reflect flexibility in evidence accumulation to the statistics of dynamic sensory environments.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal models of decision-making in dynamic environments
    Kilpatrick, Zachary P.
    Holmes, William R.
    Eissa, Tahra L.
    Josic, Kresimir
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2019, 58 : 54 - 60
  • [2] Managerial decision-making: exploration strategies in dynamic environments
    Wan, Claire K.
    Chih, Mingchang
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (05) : 1516 - 1538
  • [3] Collective decision-making for dynamic environments with visual occlusions
    Jiang, Fan
    Cheng, Hui
    Chen, Guanrong
    SWARM INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 16 (01) : 7 - 27
  • [4] Collective decision-making for dynamic environments with visual occlusions
    Fan Jiang
    Hui Cheng
    Guanrong Chen
    Swarm Intelligence, 2022, 16 : 7 - 27
  • [5] Fuzzy cognitive maps for decision-making in dynamic environments
    Nachazel, Tomas
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND EVOLVABLE MACHINES, 2021, 22 (01) : 101 - 135
  • [6] Fuzzy cognitive maps for decision-making in dynamic environments
    Tomas Nachazel
    Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2021, 22 : 101 - 135
  • [7] Collective Decision-Making with Bayesian Robots in Dynamic Environments
    Pfister, Kai
    Hamann, Heiko
    2022 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2022, : 7245 - 7250
  • [8] MODELING OF DECISION-MAKING FOR DISCRETE PROCESSES IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
    KERSTEN, GE
    SZPAKOWICZ, S
    KOPERCZAK, Z
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1990, 20 (9-10) : 29 - 43
  • [9] Noise improves collective decision-making by ants in dynamic environments
    Dussutour, A.
    Beekman, M.
    Nicolis, S. C.
    Meyer, B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1677) : 4353 - 4361
  • [10] DECISION-MAKING IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENTS
    CZOGALA, E
    ZIMMERMANN, HJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 23 (02) : 202 - 212